Staff Satisfaction to the Introduction of New Ways of Working in General Hospitals in Nigeria
Abstract:
Purpose:
The study examines
the level of satisfaction that staff of General Hospitals in Nigeria hope to
derive from the introduction and implementation of ‘New Ways of Working’ in
General Hospitals in Nigeria.
Methodology: The study was conducted in a typical General
Hospital in Nigeria. Satisfaction level to the introduction and implementation
of New Ways of Working was assessed by self-administered and pretested
questionnaire. Descriptive statistics to explain the demography of the
respondents were done; mean score and standard deviation values were used to
examine the variables.
Findings: The average mean score of the satisfaction
level to the components of new ways of information if introduced was (3.52 ± 1.54). Respondents showed highest level of satisfaction to the component afford
them a free hand to make impactful decisions on their work schedule (2.20 ±
1.18), and least level of satisfaction when they are provided with means of
deriving more information about their work when they are provided with
information technology within the hospital premises (4.95 ± 1.85).
Research
Limitations:
More General Hospitals should be involved in new studies for more
generalizability.
Practical
implications:
Staff believe they will derive some satisfaction with the introduction of ‘New
Ways of Working’.
Social
implications:
Staff satisfaction to the implementation of ‘New Ways of Working’ will allow patients
to access care with flexibility.
Value
of the Paper:
The study is promoting the introduction of ‘New Ways of Working’, to afford
staff and patients more flexibility.
Keywords: Satisfaction, Staff, New Ways of Working, General Hospitals.
References:
[1.] Al-Tawfiq JA, Memish ZA: What are our
pharmacotherapeutic options for MERS-CoV?. Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol. 2014, 7:
235-238. 10.1586/17512433.2014.890515.
[2.] Baane, R. H., Houtkamp, p., Knotter, M.,
(2010). Het nieuwewerkenontrafeld
[New ways of working figured out]. Assen: Koninklijke Van Gorcum.
[3.] Baruch, Y. (2001). The status of research on
teleworking and an agenda for future. International Journal of Management
Reviews, 3(2), 113–129.
[4.] Bass, B., Avolio, B., & Atwater, L.
(1996). The transformational and transactional leadership of men and women. Applied
Psychology, 45(1), 5–34.
[5.] Bass, B., Avolio, B., Jung, D. I., & Berson,
Y. (2003). Predicting unit performance by assessing transformational and
transactional leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(2),
207.
[6.] Berlowitz, D. R., Young, G. J., Hickey, E.
C., Saliba, D. Mittman, B. S., Czarnowski, E., Simon, B., Anderson, J. J., Ash,
A. S., Rubenstein, L. V., and Moskowitz, M. A. (2003), Quality improvement
implementation in the nursing home, Health Services Research 38, Part 1,
65-80.
[7.] Bijl, D., & Gray, M. (2011). Journey
Towards the New Way of Working: Creating Sustainable Performance and Joy at
Work. Par CC.
[8.] Bijl, D., (2007). Het nieuwewerken: Op wegnaareenproductievekenniseconomie [New Ways
of working: heading for a productive knowledge economy]. Den Haag: Sdu
Publishers bv.
[9.] Bijl, D., (2009). Aan de slag met het nieuwewerken [Let’s get to the new ways of
working]. Zeewolde: Par CC.
[10.] Blok, M., Groenesteijn, L., Berg, C. Van
Den, & Vink, P. (2011). New Ways of Working: A Proposed Framework and
Literature Review. Ergonomics and Health Aspects of Work with Computers,
3–12.
[11.] Blok, M. M., Groenesteijn, L., Schelvis, R.,
& Vink, P. (2012). New ways of working: does flexibility in time and
location of work change work behavior and affect business outcomes? Work: A Journal of Prevention, Assessment
and Rehabilitation, 41, 5075-5080.
[12.]
Bryman, A., & Bell, E. (2011). Business Research Methods (3rd
edition). New York: Oxford University Press Inc.
[13.] Cameron, K. S., & Quinn, R. E., (2008). Onderzoekenenveranderen van
organisatiecultuur [Researching and changing organizational culture]. Den
Haag: Sdu Publishers bv.
[14.]
Cronbach L.J., (1951) Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of
tests. Psychometrika 16:297-334.
[15.] De Leede, J., & Kraijenbrink, J. (2014).
The Mediating Role of Trust and Social
Cohesion in the Effects of New Ways of Working: A Dutch Case Study. Human
Resource Management, Social Innovation and Technology (Advanced Series in
Management, Volume 14). England. Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 14,
3-20.
[16.] Doherty, S., Andrey, J., & Johnson, L.
(2000). The economic and social impacts of telework. In Telework: The New
Workplace of the 21st Century Symposium, New Orleans.
[17.]
Dooley, D. (2009). Social research methods (4th edition). Harlow:
Pearson Education Limited.
[18.] Egmond van, H., (2010). Het nieuwewerken: Van visienaarpraktijk [New ways of working: From
vision to practice]. Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer.
[19.]
Gates, B. (2005). Digital Workstyle: The New World of Work A Microsoft
White Paper.
[20.] Gautret P, Benkouiten S, Salaheddine I,
Belhouchat K, Drali T, & Parola P., (2013). Hajj pilgrims knowledge about
Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus, August to September 2013. Euro
Surveill. 2013, 18: 20604.
[21.] Haterd van de, B., (2010). Werkennieuwestijl [Working on a new
style]. Amersfoort: A.W. Bruna Publishers B.V.
[22.] Keuning, D., (2007). Structuurdoorzien [Structure seen]. Groningen: Wolters Noordhoff.
[23.] Kok, A. de, Koops, J., and Helms, R. W.
(2014), Assessing the new way of working: bricks, bytes and behaviour. Pacis 2014 Proceedings. Paper 7. http://aisel.aisnet.org/pacis2014/
[24.] Kuipers, H., Amelsvoort, P., & Kramer,
E.H., (2010). Het nieuweorganisatie:
Alternatieven voor de bureaucratie [New ways of organizing: Alternatives
for bureaucracy]. Leuven: Acco.
[25.] Memish ZA, Al-Tawfiq JA, Makhdoom HQ,
Al-Rabeeah AA, Assiri A, Alhakeem RF, Alrabiah FA, Alhajjar S, Albarrak A,
Flemban H, Balkhy H, Barry M, Alhassan S, Alsubaie S, & Zumla A., (2014).
Screening for Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus infection in
hospital patients and their healthcare worker and family contacts: a
prospective descriptive study. ClinMicrobiol Infect. 2014, 20: 469-474.
10.1111/1469-0691.12562.
[26.] Newman, K., Maylor, U., & Chansarkar, B.
(2001) "The nurse retention, quality of care and patient satisfaction
chain", International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance, Vol.
14 Iss: 2, pp.57 – 68. DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1108/09526860110386500
[27.]
Nunnally, J. (1978). Psychometric theory (Second edition). New
York: McGraw-Hill.
[28.] Relf, M. (1995), Increasing job satisfaction
and motivation while reducing nursing turnover through the implementation of
shared governance, CriticalCare Nursing Quarterly 18, 3, 7-13.
[29.]
Saunders, M., Lewis, P., Thornhill, A., Booij, M., and Verckens, J. P.,
(2011). Methodenen technieken van onderzoek [Methods and techniques of
research]. Amsterdam: Pearson Education Benelux.
[30.]
Slijkhuis, J. M. (2012). A Structured Approach to Need for Structure at
Work. University Library Groningen.
[31.] Stam, P., (2011). Het nieuwewerkenmeegewogen
[New ways of working weighed in]. Utrecht: Utrecht University.
[32.] Stoffers J., Kurstjens J., & Schrijver
I.(2015). Leadership and New Ways of Working: A Case Study in a Financial
Service Organisation. International Journal of Business and Economics Research.
Vol. 4, No. 3, 2015, pp. 157-162. doi: 10.11648/j.ijber.20150403.18
[33.] Volberda, H., Jansen, J., Tempelaar, M.,
& Heij, K., (2011). Monitoren van sociale innovatie: Slimmer werken,
dynamischmanagenen flexible organiseren: Monitoring social innovation: working
smarter, dynamic management and organising flexible. Magazine for HRM, 1, 85-110.
[34.] Wensing, L., (2009). Technologie is enblijft
de sleutel tot het nieuwewerken [Technology is and remains the key to New Ways
of Working]. Retrieved from: http://hetnieuwewerkenblog.nl/technologie-sleutel-hetnieuwe-
werken/
[35.] WHO MERS-CoV Research Group, (2013). State
of knowledge and data gaps of Middle East Respiratory Syndrome coronavirus
(MERS-CoV) in humans. PLoSCurr. 2013, 5