Abstract:

The Non-Stress Test (NST) is considered an effective method for evaluating fetal well-being during the prenatal period by using an electric monitor that continuously records the fetal heart Rate (FHR). The main aim of the study is to determine assess the different maternal positions on Maternal and Foetal Health Status during Non-Stress Test among Antenatal Mothers. A descriptive cross-sectional research design with a total of 60 antenatal mothers who fulfil and meet the inclusion criteria were selected as samples by using a convenient sampling technique. The socio-demographic and obstetrical data information was collected by a self-administered questionnaire using a structured questionnaire. The level of discomfort was assessed with the Maternal Comfort Rating Scale. The demographic and obstetric data were analyzed by frequency and percentage. Mean and standard deviation were used to assess the maternal and foetal parameters. The probability of p<0.05 or less was taken as statistical. Out of 60 samples, 34 (56.7%) of mothers aged between 21 - 30 years, 28(46.7%), had a gestational age between 36 - 37 weeks, 21(35.0%) had abdominal girth between 90 - 99 cm, 49(81.7%). The mean score of the foetal movements in left lateral and supine positions were 4.14 - 4.23. Comparatively, in semi sitting position the mean score was 2.78. Compared with the other two positions in the left lateral position the mean acceleration score was 2.78. This study concluded that Semi-fowler's position demonstrated favourable maternal blood pressure during the non-stress test in the third trimester of pregnancy.

References:

[1] Siby R., Vinsi, M. S., Mathew, R., 2022, Effect of Different Maternal Positions on Comfort of Antenatal Mothers and Fetal Parameters During Non-Stress Test, Indian J Public Health, Jul-Sep; 66(3):341-343. Doi: 10.4103/ijph.ijph_1904_21. PMID: 36149118.

[2] Essa, R. M., & Hafaz, S. K., 2018, Effect of Different Positions of Pregnant Women on their Comfort and Fetal Cardiotocographic Patterns During Non-Stress Test,International Journal For Research In Health Sciences And Nursing,4(2), 01–24, https://doi.org/10.53555/hsn.v4i2.257

[3] Haws, R., Yakoob, M., Soomro, T., Menezes, E., 2009, Reducing Stillbirths: Screening and Monitoring During Pregnancy and Labor, BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, 7(9), 1-3. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-9-S1-S5

[4] Bailit, J. L., Garrett, J. M., Miller, W. C., McMahon, M. J., Cefalo, R. C., 2002, Hospital Primary Cesarean Delivery Rates and the Risk of Poor Neonatal Outcomes, Am J Obstetric Gynecol, 187(3):721–7. Doi: 10.1067/mob.2002.125886. [PubMed: 12237654].

[5] Dublin, S., Lydon-Rochelle, M., Kaplan, R. C., Watts, D. H., Critchlow, C. W., 2000, Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes After Induction of Labor Without an Identified Indication, Am J Obstetric Gynecol, 183(4):986–94. doi: 10.1067/mob.2000.106748. [PubMed: 11035351].

[6] Sarnat, H. B., Sarnat, M. S., 1976, Neonatal Encephalopathy Following Fetal Distress: A clinical and Electroencephalographic Study. Arch Neurol. 33(10):696–705. Doi: 10.1001/archneur.1976.00500100030012. [PubMed: 987769].

[7] Leslie, K., Arulkumaran, S., 2011, Intrapartum Fetal Surveillance, Obstetric Gynecology Reprod Med, 21(3):59–67. Doi: 10.1016/j.ogrm.2011.01.001.

[8] Milsom, I., Ladfors, L., Thiringer, K., Niklasson, A., Odeback, A., Thornberg, E., 2002, Influence of Maternal, Obstetric and Fetal Risk Factors on the Prevalence of Birth Asphyxia at Term in a Swedish Urban Population, Acta ObstetricGynecology Scand, 81(10):909–17. Doi: 10.1034/j.1600- 0412.2002.811003.x. [PubMed: 12366480].

[9] Walton, J. R., Peaceman, A. M., 2012, Identification, Assessment and Management of Fetal Compromise, Clin Perinatol.; 39(4):753–68.Doi: 10.1016/j.clp.2012.09.001. [PubMed: 23164176].

[10] Korcek, P., Stranak, Z., 2015, Fetal Distress and Circulatory Disturbance in Monochromic Twins: Possible Risk Factors for Sialadenitis? Into J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngology, 79(12):2476–8. Doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2015.10.052. [PubMed: 26590003].

[11] Adanikin, A. I., Awoleke, J. O., 2017, Clinical Suspicion, Management and Outcome of Intrapartum Fetal Distress in a Public Hospital with Limited Advanced Fetal Surveillance, Maternal Fetal Neonatal Med, 30(4):424–9 Doi:10.1080/14767058.2016.1174991. [PubMed: 27050656]

[12] .Aslam, H. M., Saleem, S., Afzal, R., Iqbal, U., Saleem, S. M., Shaikh, M. W., 2014, "Risk Factors of Birth Asphyxia", Ital J Pediatric, 40:94. Doi: 10.1186/s13052-014-0094-2. [PubMed: 25526846]. [PubMed Central: PMC4300075].

[13] Baskett, T. F., 1988, Gestational Age and Fetal Biophysical Assessment, Am J Obstet Gynecol, 158 (2):332–4. Doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(88)90149-4.

[14] Andreotti, F., Behar, J., Zaunseder, S., Oster, J., Clifford, G. D., 2016, An Open-Source Framework for Stress- Testing Non-Invasive Fetal Ecg Extraction Algorithms, Physiology Meas, 37(5):627–48. Doi: 10.1088/0967- 3334/37/5/627, [PubMed: 27067286].

[15] Gibb, D., Arulkumaran, S., 2017, Fetal Monitoring in Practice, London: Churchill Livingstone, 4th ed. Page no. 120-125 https://amzn.in/d/0dim3KqA

[16] Wasson, C., Kelly, A., Ninan, D., 2019, Tran, Q., Intrapartum Fetal Assessment. Absolute Obstetric Anesthesia Review, Cham: Springer, p. 145–6. Doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-96980-0_47.

[17] Doctor, B.A., O’Riordan, M. A., Kirchner, H. L., Shah, D., Hack M., 2001, Perinatal Correlates and Neonatal Outcomes of Small for Gestational Age Infants Born at Term Gestation, Am J Obstetric Gynecol, 185 (3):652–9. Doi: 10.1067/mob.2001.116749. [PubMed: 11568794]

[18] Gabbe, S. G., Niebyl, J. R., Simpson, J. L., 2007, Obstetrics: Normal and Problem Pregnancies, 5th ed, Philadelphia: Churchill Livingstone Elsevier, pg.1391

[19] Patel, R., Smitha, M.V., Jena, S. K., Jacob, J., John, J., 2022, Do Different Positions During a Non-Stress Test Affect the Maternofetal Physiological Parameters and Comfort in Pregnant Women? J Educ Health Promot., Nov 26(11), 386-90 Doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_641_22. PMID: 36618471; PMCID: PMC9818695.

[20] Subramanian, V., Venkat, J., Dhanapal, M., 2016, Which is Superior, Doppler Velocimetry or Non-Stress Test or Both in Predicting the Perinatal Outcome of High-Risk Pregnancies, J Obstetric Gynaecol India. 66 (1):149–56. Doi: 10.1007/s13224-015-0829 [PubMed: 27651594]. [PubMed Central: PMC5016437].

[21] Samuel, Rachel Ms; Karkada, Sushmitha Ms; Fermamdes, Sweety Ms; and Bhat, Parvathi Dr 2015, Materno Foetal Physiological Parameters in Sitting and Left Lateral Position During Non - Stress Test (NST) Monitoring in Pregnancy: A Cross Over Study, Manipal Journal of Nursing and Health Sciences, Vol. 1 (2), 83-86. https://impressions.manipal.edu/mjnhs/vol1/iss2/4

[22] EL Sayed, H., Mohamady, S., 2016, Effects of Different Maternal Positions During Non-Stress Test on Maternofetal Physiological Parameters,Tanta Sci Nurs J, 10:116-31.

[23] Cito, G., Luisi, S., Mezzesimi, A., Cavicchioli, C., Calonaci, G., Petraglia, F., 2005, Maternal Position During Non-Stress Test and Fetal Heart Rate Patterns, Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 84:335-8

[24] Kabootari, M., Mobasheri, E., Qorbani, M., Asayesh, H., 2012, Non-Stress Test Diagnostic Values for Predicting Fetal Outcomes in High-Risk Pregnancies, Iran J Obstetrics Gynecological Infertility, 15(7):17–23. Persian. Doi: 10.22038/ijogi.2012.5716.