An Assessment of Knowledge of Health Workers in Hospitals of Southern Province of Zambia, Towards Marketing of Breastmilk Substitutes Regulations
Abstract:
Background: Optimal breastfeeding practices have been
undermined by unregulated marketing of breastmilk substitutes worldwide,
resulting in about 820, 000 preventable deaths per year among children under
five years globally. The International Code (thereafter called the Code) of
Marketing Breastmilk Substitutes was developed by the World Health
Organization, the United Nations Children's Emergency Fund and stakeholders to
protect, promote and support breastfeeding. Member states are expected to
domesticate the Code. Zambia enacted Statutory Instrument No. 48 of 2006,
Regulations on marketing of breastmilk substitutes. Successful implementation
calls for a good level of knowledge among health workers. However, we found no
study, in Zambia on the marketing of breastmilk substitutes Regulations.
Objective: To assess the level of knowledge of health workers on Zambia’s
Regulations on marketing breastmilk substitutes. Study design and methods: A
mixed-method cross-sectional study. Data was collected online and in person.
Probability proportional to size calculation yielded an estimated sample size
of 384. A sample size of 410 after adjusting upwards assumed non-response rate,
401 participants responded. Quantitative data were analyzed using the Social
Statistical Package for Social Sciences. Knowledge results were described by
frequencies and percentages. Tests were conducted using univariable linear and
multivariable regression analysis. A p-value of <0.05 was considered
statistically significant. Thematic analysis was used for qualitative data
analysis. Results: The mean overall level of good knowledge of health workers
was 0.339 or 34% [SE: 0.0221; 95%CI: (0.2959, 0.3828)]. Conclusion: The level
of knowledge among health workers in hospitals of Southern Province, Zambia was
poor.
References:
[1] Piwoz and Huffman, 2015, The Impact of
Marketing of Breast-Milk Substitutes on WHO-Recommended Breastfeeding
Practices. Food Nutr. Bull. 36, 373–386. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0379572115602174.
[2] Hernandez-Cordero, S., Lozada‐Tequeanes, A.
L., Shamah-Levy, T., Lutter, C., González de Cosio, T., Saturno-Hernández, P.,
dommarco, J. R., Grummewr-Strawn, L., 2018, Violations of the International
Code of Marketing of Breast-milk Substitutes in Mexico. Matern. Child Nutr.,
15(1), Article e12682 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7199041/pdf/MCN-15-e12682.pdf.
[3] WHO and UNICEF, 2022, How the Marketing of
Formula Milk influences our decisions on Infant Feeding.
https://www.unicef.org/media/115916/file/Multicountry%20study%20examining%20the%20impact%20of%20BMS%20marketing%20on%20inf
ant%20feeding%20decisions%20and%20practices,%20UNICEF,%20WHO%202022.pdf.
[4] Victoria, C.G., Bahl, R., Barros, A.J.D.,
França, G.V.A., Horton, S., 2016, Breastfeeding in the 21st century:
epidemiology, mechanisms, and lifelong effect. Lancet. 387(10017):475–90.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(1 5)01024-7.
[5] WHO, 1981, International Code of Marketing
Breastmilk Substitutes. https://breastfeedingcanada.ca/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/TheCode-En.pdf.
[6] WHO, 2020, The International Code of
Marketing of breast-milk substitutes-Frequently asked questions https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240005990.
[7] Brady, J.P., 2012, Marketing breast milk
substitutes: problems and perils throughout the world. Arch Dis Child
(97): 529–532. https://adc.bmj.com/content/archdischild/97/6/529.full.pdf.
[8] Becker, G., Paul, Z., Constance, C.,
Jennifer, C., Allison, B., Eva, P., Janice. D. and Roger, M., 2021, Global
evidence of persistent violations of the International Code of Marketing of
Breastmilk Substitutes: A systematic scoping review. Matern Child Nutr.
18(S3): e13335. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/mcn.13335.
[9] Salasibew, M., Ayyaz, K., Brian, F., Paul,
G., 2008, Awareness and reported violations of the WHO International Code and
Pakistan's national breastfeeding legislation; A descriptive crosssectional
survey. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8800076/.
[10] Hidayana, I., Februhartantly, J., &
Parady, V., 2017, Violations of the International Code of Marketing of
Breastmilk Substitutes: Indonesia context. Public Health Nutrition
20(1), 165-173. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27323845/.
[11] Velasco. A. C. C. F., Maria. I. C. O,
Cristiano. S. B., 2022, Harassment of health professionals by the infant food
industry at scientific events. https://www.scielosp.org/article/rsp/2022.v56/70/https://www.scielosp.org/article/rsp/2022.v56/70/.
[12] Čatipović, M., Zrink, P., Drita, P., Paula,
C., and Josip, G., 2022, Behaviour, attitudes and knowledge of healthcare
workers on Breastfeeding. Children (9): 1173. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9406792/pdf/children-09-01173.pdf.
[13] Doherty, T., Catherine, J. P., Silondile,
L., Lyn, H., Gillian. K., Sithembile, D., Gilbert. T., Chistiane, H., 2022,
They push their products through me: Health Professionals’ perspectives on and
exposure to marketing of commercial milk formula in Cape Town and Johannesburg,
South Africa – a qualitative study. https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/bmjopen/12/4/e055872.full.pdf.
[14] Champeny, M., Pereira, C., Sweet, L., Khin,
M., Coly, N., Gueye, E., … Huffman, S., 2016, Point-of-sale Promotion of
Breastmilk Substitutes and Commercially Produced Complementary Foods in
Cambodia, Nepal. Senegal and Tanzania: Maternal & Child Nutrition. Matern
Child Nutri. 12(2): 126–139. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5071702/.
[15] Aguayo, V. M., Jay, S. R., Souleyman,
Ander, N.O., 2003, Monitoring compliance with the International Code of
Marketing of Breastmilk Substitutes in West Africa: Multisite cross-sectional
survey in Togo and Burkina Faso. BMJ 236(7381):127. doi:
10.1136/bmj.326.7381.127 i: 10.1136/bmj.326.7381.127.
[16] Emerson, J., Kouassi, F., Kouamé, r. O.,
Damey, F. N., Cissel, A. S., Tharaney, M., 2021, Mothers' and Health workers'
exposure to breastmilk substitutes promotions in Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire. Matern.
Child Nutr., 7, Article e13230. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8476441/pdf/MCN-17-e13230.pdf.
[17] Government of Zambia, 2006, Statutory
Instrument No. 48 of 2006. The Food and Drug Act (Laws, Volume 17, Cap 303)
Food and Drugs (Marketing of Breast Milk Substitutes) Regulations, 2006. http://extwprlegs1.fao.org/docs/pdf/zam66935.pdf.
[18] Government of Zambia, 2010, Monitoring
Compliance and Enforcement of Breastmilk Substitutes Regulations: A Manual for
Environmental Health Officers; A Guide for Administration of Food and Drugs
(Marketing of Breastmilk Substitutes') Regulations, 2006 (Statutory 48 of
2006). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/315669425_Marketing_of_breast-milk_substitutes_in_Zambia_Evaluation_of_compliance_to_the_international_regulatory_code/link/5bbd0c14299bf1049b78623e/download.
[19] Funduluka, P., Bosomprah, S., Chilengi, R., Mugode, R. H.,
Bwembya, P. A., Mudenda, B., 2017, Marketing of breast-milk substitutes in
Zambia: evaluation of compliance to the international regulatory code, Journal of Public Health, 40(1), e1–e7, https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdx023.
[20] Nyaboke, C., 2021, Assessment of knowledge,
attitude and practices on Kenya’s breast milk substitutes Act (2012) among
nurses in Mbagathi and Pumwani Hospitals, Kenya http://repository.kemu.ac.ke/bitstream/handle/123456789/1265/Clement%20thesis%20Clearance%20%281%29.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y.