Key Stakeholders’ Perspectives on Implementation and Scale-up of Telehealth in HIV Care in Harare, Zimbabwe
Abstract:
The World Health Organisation recommends
telehealth as an alternative to help reach remote or underserved areas. Telehealth
adoption is therefore key to ending the HIV pandemic. Successful implementation
and scale-up of telehealth heavily rely on stakeholders’ involvement. This study
explored key stakeholders’ perspectives on the implementation and scale-up of telehealth
in HIV care in Harare. In-depth interviews were conducted with professionals within
the Ministry of Health and Childcare and its partners, between May and August 2023.
Fourteen purposively selected stakeholders were interviewed. Thematic approach to
analysis with a coding framework guided by Consolidated Framework for Implementation
Research was adopted. Key stakeholders perceived telehealth as a potentially effective
intervention, which can improve health delivery. Key stakeholders cited the following
challenges for implementation and scale-up of telehealth in HIV care: poor internet
and mobile network; financial challenges; and unavailability of policies. Key stakeholders
suggested the following strategies to the successful implementation and scale-up:
multi-sectoral collaboration for reliable and affordable mobile and internet connectivity;
policy formulation, donors’ engagement; and recruitment of competent staff. The study findings showed the confidence
of key stakeholders in Harare to effectively sustain telehealth in HIV intervention.
Despite its promising potential, significant hurdles to telehealth implementation
exist and should be addressed to realise the full potential. Further research incorporating
telehealth end-users is recommended, to fully understand challenges and hence inform
policy.
References:
[1] Thomas, L. T., Lee, C. M. Y., McClelland, K., Nunis,
G., Robinson, S., & Norman, R. (2023). Health workforce perceptions on
telehealth augmentation opportunities. BMC Health Services Research,
23(1), 182. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-09174-4.
[2] Oleribe, O. E., Momoh, J., Uzochukwu, B. S.,
Mbofana, F., Adebiyi, A., Barbera, T., Williams, R., & Taylor Robinson, S.
D. (2019). Identifying Key Challenges Facing Healthcare Systems in Africa and
Potential Solutions. International Journal of General Medicine, Volume
12, 395–403. https://doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S223882.
[3] Nchasi, G., Okonji, O. C., Jena, R., Ahmad, S.,
Soomro, U., Kolawole, B. O., Nawaz, F. A., Essar, M. Y., & Aborode, A. T.
(2022). Challenges faced by African healthcare workers during the third wave of
the pandemic. Health Science Reports, 5(6), e893. https://doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.893.
[4] World Health Organisation. (n.d.). Global strategy
on digital health 2020-2025. World Health Organization. Retrieved 3 April 2023,
from https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/344249/9789240020924-eng.pdf.
[5] Breton, M., Sullivan, E. E., Deville-Stoetzel, N.,
McKinstry, D., DePuccio, M., Sriharan, A., Deslauriers, V., Dong, A., &
McAlearney, A. S. (2021). Telehealth challenges during COVID-19 as reported by
primary healthcare physicians in Quebec and Massachusetts. BMC Family
Practice, 22(1), 192. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-021-01543-4.
[6] Snoswell, C. L., Taylor, M. L., Comans, T. A.,
Smith, A. C., Gray, L. C., & Caffery, L. J. (2020). Determining if
Telehealth Can Reduce Health System Costs: Scoping Review. Journal of
Medical Internet Research, 22(10), e17298. https://doi.org/10.2196/17298.
[7] Eze, N. D., Mateus, C., & Cravo Oliveira
Hashiguchi, T. (2020). Telemedicine in the OECD: An umbrella review of clinical
and cost-effectiveness, patient experience and implementation. PLOS ONE,
15(8), e0237585. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0237585.
[8] Salgado, S., Felzien, G., & Brumbeloe, J.
(2021). Georgia Leverages Telehealth to Expand HIV Care Management in
Underserved Areas. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 61(5 Suppl
1), S55–S59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2021.07.001.
[9] Phan, J. M., Kim, S., Linh, Đ. T. T., Cosimi, L. A.,
& Pollack, T. M. (2022). Telehealth Interventions for HIV in Low- and
Middle-Income Countries. Current HIV/AIDS Reports, 19(6), 600–609. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11904-022-00630-0.
[10] Pollack, T. M., Nhung, V. T. T., Vinh, D. T. N.,
Hao, D. T., Trang, L. T. T., Duc, P. A., Kinh, N. V., Dung, N. T. H., Dung, D.
L., Ninh, N. T., Huyen, H. T. T., Huy, V. X., Hai, D. M., Khanh, T. H., Hien,
N. T. T., Khuong, P. T. A., Trong, N. T., Lam, N. V., Phinh, V. N., … Cosimi,
L. (2020). Building HIV healthcare worker capacity through telehealth in
Vietnam. BMJ Global Health, 5(4), e002166. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2019-002166.
[11] Speyer, R., Denman, D., Wilkes-Gillan, S., Chen, Y.,
Bogaardt, H., Kim, J., Heckathorn, D., & Cordier, R. (2018). Effects of
telehealth by allied health professionals and nurses in rural and remote areas:
A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 50(3),
225–235. https://doi.org/10.2340/16501977-2297.
[12] Huang, Z., Tao, H., Meng, Q., & Jing, L. (2015).
MANAGEMENT OF ENDOCRINE DISEASE: Effects of telecare intervention on glycemic
control in type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized
controlled trials. European Journal of Endocrinology, 172(3), R93–R101. https://doi.org/10.1530/EJE-14-0441.
[13] Nair, U., Armfield, N. R., Chatfield, M. D., &
Edirippulige, S. (2018). The effectiveness of telemedicine interventions to
address maternal depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal
of Telemedicine and Telecare, 24(10), 639–650. https://doi.org/10.1177/1357633X18794332.
[14] Udsen, F. W., Hejlesen, O., & Ehlers, L. H.
(2014). A systematic review of the cost and cost-effectiveness of telehealth
for patients suffering from chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Journal
of Telemedicine and Telecare, 20(4), 212–220. https://doi.org/10.1177/1357633X14533896.
[15] Hui CY., Walton R., McKinstry B., Jackson T., Parker
R., & Pinnock H. (2017). The use of mobile applications to support
self-management for people with asthma: a systematic review of controlled
studies to identify features associated with clinical effectiveness and
adherence. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association,
24(3), 619–632. 10.1093/jamia/ocw143.
[16] 16. Liptrott, S., Bee, P., & Lovell, K. (2018).
Acceptability of telephone support as perceived by patients with cancer: A
systematic review. European Journal of Cancer Care, 27(1), e12643.
https://doi.org/10.1111/ecc.12643
[17] 17. Liddy, C., Drosinis, P., & Keely, E. (2016).
Electronic consultation systems: Worldwide prevalence and their impact on
patient care—a systematic review. Family Practice, 33(3), 274–285. https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmw024.
[18] Labisi, T., Regan, N., Davis, P., & Fadul, N.
(2022). HIV Care Meets Telehealth: A Review of Successes, Disparities, and
Unresolved Challenges. Current HIV/AIDS Reports. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11904-022-00623-z.
[19] Centre for Disease Control and Prevention. (2018).
Telehealth for HIV Prevention and Care Services. Centre for Disease Control and
Disease. https://www.cdc.gov/hiv/effective-interventions/treat/telehealth/index.html.
[20] Esmaeili, E. D., Azizi, H., Dastgiri, S., &
Kalankesh, L. R. (2023). Does telehealth affect the adherence to ART among
patients with HIV? A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Infectious
Diseases, 23(1), 169. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-023-08119-w.
[21] Dandachi, D., Freytag, J., Giordano, T. P., &
Dang, B. N. (2020). It is Time to Include Telehealth in Our Measure of Patient
Retention in HIV Care. AIDS and Behavior, 24(9), 2463–2465. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-020-02880-8.
[22] Mgbako, O., Miller, E. H., Santoro, A. F., Remien,
R. H., Shalev, N., Olender, S., Gordon, P., & Sobieszczyk, M. E. (2020).
COVID-19, Telemedicine, and Patient Empowerment in HIV Care and Research. AIDS
and Behavior, 24(7), 1990–1993. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-020-02926-x.
[23] International Center for AIDS Care and Treatment
Program. (2020). Zimbabwe population-based HIV impact assessment. https://phia.icap.columbia.edu/zimbabwe2020-final-report/.
[24] Aniteye, P., & Mayhew, S.H. (2013). Shaping
legal abortion provision in Ghana: Using policy theory to understand
provider-related obstacles to policy implementation. Health Research and
Policy Systems, 11(23). https://doi.org/10.1186/1478-4505-11-23.
[25] Bennett, S., Mahmood, S.S., Edward, A., Tetui, M.
& Ekirapa-Kiracho, E. (2017). Strengthening scaling up through learning
from implementation: Comparing experiences from Afghanistan, Bangladesh and
Uganda. Health Research and Policy Systems, 15(108). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-017-0270-0.
[26] Tong, A., Sainsbury, P., & Craig, J. (2007).
Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): A 32-item
checklist for interviews and focus groups. International Journal for Quality
in Health Care, 19(6), 349–357. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzm042.
[27] Saunders, B., Sim, J., Kingstone, T., Baker, S.,
Waterfield, J., Bartlam, B., Burroughs, H., & Jinks, C. (2018). Saturation
in qualitative research: Exploring its conceptualization and
operationalization. Quality & Quantity, 52(4), 1893–1907. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-017-0574-8.
[28] Iliffe, S., Wilcock, J., Drennan, V., Goodman, C.,
Griffin, M., Knapp, M., Lowery, D., Manthorpe, J., Rait, G., & Warner, J.
(2015). Changing practice in dementia care in the community: Developing and
testing evidence-based interventions, from timely diagnosis to end of life
(EVIDEM). Programme Grants for Applied Research, 3(3), 1–596. https://doi.org/10.3310/pgfar03030.
[29] Chang, C.-P., Lee, T.-T., & Mills, M. E. (2013).
Telecare for the elderly—Community nurses’ experiences in Taiwan. Computers,
Informatics, Nursing: CIN, 31(1), 29–35. https://doi.org/10.1097/NXN.0b013e318266ca94.
[30] Adeloye, D., Adigun, T., Misra, S., & Omoregbe,
N. (2017). Assessing the Coverage of E-Health Services in Sub-Saharan Africa: A
Systematic Review and Analysis. Methods of Information in Medicine, 56(03),
189–199. https://doi.org/10.3414/ME16-05-0012.
[31] Aranda-Jan, C. B., Mohutsiwa-Dibe, N., &
Loukanova, S. (2014). Systematic review on what works, what does not work and
why of implementation of mobile health (mHealth) projects in Africa. BMC
Public Health, 14, 188. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-14-188.
[32] Kruse, C.,
Betancourt, J., Ortiz, S., Valdes Luna, S. M., Bamrah, I. K., & Segovia, N.
(2019). Barriers to the Use of Mobile Health in Improving Health Outcomes in
Developing Countries: Systematic Review. Journal of Medical Internet
Research, 21(10), e13263. https://doi.org/10.2196/13263.
[33] Yelverton, V., Qiao, S., Weissman, S., Olatosi, B.,
& Li, X. (2021). Telehealth for HIV Care Services in South Carolina:
Utilization, Barriers, and Promotion Strategies During the COVID-19 Pandemic.
AIDS and Behavior, 25(12), 3909–3921. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-021-03349-y.
[34] Mulawa, M. I., Rosengren, A. L., Amico, K. R.,
Hightow-Weidman, L. B., & Muessig, K. E. (2021). mHealth to reduce
HIV-related stigma among youth in the United States: A scoping review.
MHealth, 7, 35. https://doi.org/10.21037/mhealth-20-68.
[35] Asah, F. N., Kaasbøll, J. J., & Anthun, K. S.
(2022). Obstacles of eHealth Capacity Building and Innovation Promotion
Initiative in African Countries. In B. Blobel, B. Yang, & M. Giacomini
(Eds.), Studies in Health Technology and Informatics. IOS Press. https://doi.org/10.3233/SHTI220961.
[36] Queirós, A., Faria, D., & Almeida, F. (2017).
Strengths and limitations of qualitative and quantitative research methods. European
Journal of Education Studies. 3(9).a.