Abstract:

Background: Nylon bristles are the most commonly used type of bristle in toothbrushes, but they have both advantages and disadvantages. Nylon bristles can be too hard or abrasive for some people's teeth and gums. Nylon is not biodegradable and can harbor bacteria if not cleaned properly. Aims: In order to explore the possibility of using natural fibers this study was conducted. Materials and Methods: Twigs of neem, banyan, babool and miswak were purchased as fresh twigs, wiped clean, hammered on a hard wood base to obtain fibers of desired lengths. Physical appearance, Bend Recovery, Folding Endurance and Antibacterial adhesion against B. Subtilis were evaluated. All experiments were performed as triplicate and mean and standard deviation were reported. Results: Digital microscopy showed well defined fibers of fairly constant diameter, apparent from the superimposed scale. Results of bend recovery analysis showed that miswak fibers were flexible and recovery was good. Folding Endurance test showed miswak and banyan were having great folding endurance. Bacterial adhesion with B. Subtilis was heavy in all fibres. The antibacterial activity of four extracts showed that all groups had identifiable antimicrobial activity at 2000 µg concentrations. Conclusion: From results of the study, it can be inferred that miswak is the most suitable material to be used for fabricating bristles in its native form.

References:

[1] ADA.org. (2012, November 12). Toothbrushes – American Dental Association. https://www.ada.org/en/resources/research/science-and-research-institute/oral-health-topics/toothbrushes.

[2] Plastic toothbrush – Design life. (2023, June 15). http://www.designlife-cycle.com/plastic-toothbrush#:~:text=The%20materials%20that%20are%20used,the%20main%20material%20of%20bristles.

[3] Phillips, R. W., & Swartz, M. L., 1953, Effects of diameter of nylon bristles on enamel surface. Journal of the American Dental Association, 47(1), 20–26.

[4] Rajeswaran, S. A., & Sankari Malaiappan, D. J. AS SG.,2021, A Comparative Study on the efficacy of plaque removal of three natural toothbrushes-an in-vitro study. NVEO-natural volatiles and essential oils Journal, 6054–6069.

[5] Offsets, C. Calculator CF. Biodegradable bamboo toothbrush: Greenwashing or eco-friendly?

[6] Assari, A. S., Mohammed Mahrous, M., Ahmad, Y. A., Alotaibi, F., Alshammari, M., AlTurki, F., & AlShammari, T., 2022, Efficacy of different sterilization techniques for toothbrush decontamination: An ex vivo study. Cureus, 14(1), e21117.

[7] E. I. du Pont de Nemours, 1979, Stiffness: Folding endurance test. Bend recovery of TYNEX® and HEROX® nylon filaments, technical data Bulletin No. 5. Plastics Department.

[8] Nair, A. B., Kumria, R., Harsha, S., Attimarad, M., Al-Dhubiab, B. E., & Alhaider, I. A., 2013, In vitro techniques to evaluate buccal films. Journal of Controlled Release, 166(1), 10–21.

[9] Khan, G., Yadav, S. K., Patel, R. R., Nath, G., Bansal, M., & Mishra, B., 2016, Development and evaluation of biodegradable chitosan films of metronidazole and levofloxacin for the management of periodontitis. AAPS PharmSciTech, 17(6), 1312–1325.

[10] Carranza, F. A., 2003, Clinical periodontology (9th ed). Saunders.

[11] Wilkins, E. M., McCullough, P. A., 1999, Clinical practice of the dental hygienist (3rd ed). Lea & Febiger.

[12] Bass, C. C. (1948). The optimum characteristics of toothbrushes for personal oral hygiene. Dental Items of Interest, 70(7), 697–718.

[13] Hine, M. (1956). The toothbrush. International Dental Journal. Google Scholar, 6, 15–25.

[14] Kumar, S., Kumari, M., Acharya, S., & Prasad, R., 2014, Comparison of surface abrasion produced on the enamel surface by a standard dentifrice using three different toothbrush bristle designs: A profilometric in vitro study. Journal of Conservative Dentistry, 17(4), 369–373.

[15] Nur Diyana, A. F., Khalina, A., Sapuan, M. S., Lee, C. H., Aisyah, H. A., Nurazzi, M. N., & Ayu, R. S., 2022, Physical, mechanical, and thermal properties and characterization of natural fiber composites reinforced poly (lactic acid): Miswak (Salvadora persica L.) fibers. International Journal of Polymer Science, 2022, 1–20.

[16] Thandavamoorthy, R., & Palanivel, A., 2020, Testing and evaluation of tensile and impact strength of neem/banyan fiber-reinforced hybrid composite. Journal of Testing and Evaluation, 48(1), 647–655.

[17] Mrudhula, R., Dinesh Sankar Reddy, P., & Veeresh Kumar, G. B., 2023, Preparation of cellulose nanofibers (CNFs) from Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea) and Acacia arabica (babul plant). In Recent trends in product design and intelligent manufacturing systems (pp. 429–438). Springer Nature Singapore.

[18] Al-Bayati, F. A., & Sulaiman, K. D., 2008, In vitro antimicrobial activity of Salvadora persica L. extracts against some isolated oral pathogens in Iraq. Turkish Journal of Biology, 32, 57–62.

[19] Sofrata, A. H., Claesson, R. L., Lingström, P. K., & Gustafsson, A. K., 2008, Strong antibacterial effect of miswak against oral microorganisms associated with periodontitis and caries. Journal of Periodontology, 79(8), 1474–1479.

[20] Almas, K., & Al-Zeid, Z., 2004, The immediate antimicrobial effect of a toothbrush and miswak on cariogenic bacteria: a clinical study. The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice, 5(1), 105–114.

[21] Elangovan, A., Muranga, J., & Joseph, E., 2012, Comparative evaluation of the antimicrobial efficacy of four chewing sticks commonly used in South India: An in vitro study. Indian Journal of Dental Research, 23(6), 840.

[22] Norton, M. R., & Addy, M., 1989, Chewing sticks versus toothbrushes in West Africa. A pilot study. Clinical Preventive Dentistry, 11(3), 11–13.

[23] Gazi, M., Saini, T., Ashri, N., & Lambourne, A., 1990, Meswak chewing stick versus conventional toothbrush as an oral hygiene aid. Clinical Preventive Dentistry, 12(4), 19–23.

[24] Al-Otaibi, M., Al-Harthy, M., Söder, B., Gustafsson, A., & Angmar-Månsson, B., 2003, Comparative effect of chewing sticks and tooth brushing on plaque removal and gingival health. Oral Health and Preventive Dentistry, 1(4), 301–307.