Retained Foreign Body, Still a Reality and Consequence of Non-use of the WHO Surgical Safety Check Lists in Tropical Surgery
Abstract:
Adhesions are a major cause of acute
abdomen in previously operated patients. The presence of a retained foreign body
in the abdomen is a leading factor in the development of post-operative adhesion.
It is, therefore important to take all necessary measures to avoid retained foreign
bodies in the abdomen, as this increases the risk of developing post-operative adhesions
and complications. A 32yr old female with a relevant past surgical history of an
emergency laparotomy indicated for a ruptured ectopic pregnancy presented as an
emergency 3 months after the above surgery at a tropical regional hospital with
signs of generalized peritonism, following a brief history of sudden onset of lower
abdominal pains. A diagnosis of bowel obstruction was made. Resuscitation was done,
followed by an emergency exploratory laparotomy. It revealed the presence of a retained
foreign body (gauze in our case), surrounded by multiple adhesion around the ileo-cecal
junction with 2 meters of ischemic small bowel. Adhesion lysis was done, foreign
body was extracted, the ischemic bowel was resected, and an end-to-end anastomosis
was performed using Lambert’s
technique. The patient had a smooth recovery. Implementing the effective
use of the WHO surgical checklists before incision and before closing the abdomen
will prevent foreign body retention, hence reducing post-operative complications.
References:
[1] Luijendijk,
R. W., de Lange, D. C., Wauters, C. C., Hop, W. C., Duron, J. J., Pailler, J. L.,
Camprodon, B. R., Holmdahl, L., van Geldorp, H. J., & Jeekel, J. (1996). Foreign
material in postoperative adhesions. Annals of surgery, 223(3), 242–248.
https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-199603000-00003.
[2]
“WHO surgical safety checklist and implementation
manual”. World Health Organization. 2010-12-08. Archived from the original on July
2, 2008. Retrieved 2015-04-23.
[3] Mock,
Charles N.; Donkor, Peter; Gawande, Atul; Jamieson, Dean T.; Kruk, Margaret E.;
Debas, Haile T. (2015). “1. Essential surgery: key messages of this volume”. In
Debas, Haile T.; Peter, Donkor; Gawande, Atul; Jamison, Dean T.; Kruk, Margaret
E. (eds.). Disease Control Priorities, Third Edition (Volume 1): Essential
Surgery. Vol.
1 (3rd ed.). Washington
: World Bank Publications. p. 13. ISBN 978-1-4648-0346-8.
[4]
“Decade of improved outcomes for patients
thanks to Surgical Safety Checklist”. www.england.nhs.uk.
Retrieved 5 February 2021.
[5]
“WHO | WHO Surgical Safety Checklist”. WHO.
Archived from the original on July 10, 2017. Retrieved 5 February 2021.
[6] Treadwell,
Jonathan R; Lucas, Scott; Tsou, Amy Y (April 2014). “Surgical checklists: a systematic review of impacts and implementation”. BMJ Quality &
Safety. 23 (4): 299–318. Doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001797. ISSN 2044-5415. PMC 3963558. PMID
23922403.
[7]
WHO Guidelines for Safe Surgery 2009. World
Health Organization Press. 2009. p. 6. ISBN 978-92-4-159855-2. Archived from the
original on November 7, 2017.
[8]
Haynes, Alex B.; Weiser, Thomas G.; Berry,
William R.; Lipsitz, Stuart R.; Breizat, Abdel-Hadi S.; Dellinger, E. Patchen; Herbosa,
Teodoro; Joseph, Sudhir; Kibatala, Pascience L.; Lapitan, Marie Carmela M.; Merry,
Alan F. (2009-01-29). “A Surgical Safety Checklist to Reduce Morbidity and Mortality
in a Global Population”. New England Journal of Medicine. 360 (5): 491–499. doi:10.1056/NEJMsa0810119.
ISSN 0028-4793. PMID 19144931.
[9] GlobalSurg
Collaborative (2016). “Mortality of emergency abdominal surgery in high-, middle-
and low-income countries”. British Journal of Surgery. 103 (8): 971–988.
doi:10.1002/bjs.10151. hdl:20.500.11820/7c4589f5-7845-4405-a384-dfb5653e2163.
PMID 27145169. S2CID 20764511.
[10] GlobalSurg
Collaborative (2019). “Pooled analysis of WHO Surgical Safety Checklist use and
mortality after emergency laparotomy” (PDF). British Journal of Surgery. 106 (2) : 103–112. Doi:10.1002/bjs.11051. PMC 6492154. PMID
30620059.
[11] GlobalSurg
Collaborative (2019). “Pooled analysis of WHO Surgical Safety Checklist use and
mortality after emergency laparotomy” (PDF). British Journal of Surgery. 106 (2) : 103–112. Doi:10.1002/bjs.11051. PMC 6492154. PMID
30620059.
[12] Ellis,
H., Moran, B. J., Thompson, J. N., Parker, M. C., Wilson, M. S., Menzies, D., McGuire,
A., Lower, A. M., Hawthorn, R. J., O’Brien, F., Buchan, S., & Crowe, A. M. (1999).
Adhesion-related hospital readmissions after abdominal and pelvic surgery: a retrospective
cohort study. Lancet (London, England), 353(9163), 1476–1480. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(98)09337-4.
[13] Wilson,
I., & Walker, I. (2009). The WHO Surgical Safety Checklist: the evidence. Journal of perioperative practice, 19(10), 362–364. https://doi.org/10.1177/175045890901901002.
[14] Gawande, A. A., Studdert, D. M., Orav, E. J., Brennan,
T. A., & Zinner, M. J. (2003). Risk factors for retained instruments and sponges
after surgery. The New England journal of medicine, 348(3), 229–235. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsa021721.
[15] Rowlands A. (2012). Risk factors associated with incorrect
surgical counts. AORN journal, 96(3), 272–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aorn.2012.06.012.
[16] González-Quintero,
V. H., & Cruz-Pachano, F. E. (2009). Preventing adhesions in obstetric and gynecologic surgical procedures. Reviews
in obstetrics & gynecology, 2(1), 38–45.
[17] Ergul, E., & Korukluoglu, B. (2008). Peritoneal adhesions:
facing the enemy. International journal of surgery (London, England), 6(3), 253–260.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2007.05.010.
[18] Ten Broek, R. P., Strik, C., Issa, Y., Bleichrodt, R. P.,
& van Goor, H. (2013). Adhesiolysis-related morbidity in abdominal surgery.
Annals of surgery, 258(1), 98–106. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e31826f4969.
[19] Wan, W., Le,
T., Riskin, L., & Macario, A. (2009). Improving safety in the operating room: a systematic literature review of
retained surgical sponges. Current opinion in anaesthesiology, 22(2), 207–214. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACO.0b013e328324f82d.
[20] Ulsenheimer K. (2007). Belassene Fremdkörper--aus der Sicht
des Juristen [Retained foreign bodies from the point of view of the jurist]. Der
Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen, 78(1), 28–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00104-006-1280-6.
[21] Fouelifack, F. Y., Fouogue, J. T., Fouedjio, J. H., &
Sando, Z. (2013). A case of abdominal textiloma following gynecologic surgery at
the Yaounde Central Hospital, Cameroon. The Pan African medical journal, 16, 147.
https://doi.org/10.11604/pamj.2013.16.147.3201.
[22] Mefire, A.
C., Tchounzou, R., Guifo, M. L., Fokou, M., Pagbe, J. J., Essomba, A., & Malonga,
E. E. (2009). Retained sponge after abdominal surgery: experience from
a third world country. The Pan African Medical
Journal, 2, 10.
[23] Greenberg, C. C., Regenbogen, S. E., Lipsitz, S. R., Diaz-Flores,
R., & Gawande, A. A. (2008). The frequency and significance of discrepancies
in the surgical count. Annals of surgery, 248(2), 337–341. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e318181c9a3.
[24] Serghini, I., El Fikri, A., Salim Lalaoui, J., Zoubir,
M., Boui, M., & Boughanem, M. (2011). Textilome abdominal
: à propos d’un cas. The Pan African Medical Journal, 9.
[25] Târcoveanu, E., Dimofte, G., Georgescu, S., Vasilescu,
A., Lupaşcu, C., Bradea, C., & Van Hee, R. (2011). Laparoscopic retrieval of
gossypibomas--short series and review of literature. Acta chirurgica Belgica,
111(6), 366–369. https://doi.org/10.1080/00015458.2011.11680774.
[26] Smith DA, Kashyap S, Nehring SM. Bowel Obstruction. [Updated
2022 Jun 5]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing;
2022 Jan-. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK441975/.
[27] Kopka, L., Fischer, U., Gross, A. J., Funke, M., Oestmann,
J. W., & Grabbe, E. (1996). CT of retained surgical sponges (textilomas): pitfalls
in detection and evaluation. Journal of computer assisted tomography, 20(6), 919–923.
https://doi.org/10.1097/00004728-199611000-00009.
[28] Lauwers, P. R., & Van Hee, R. H. (2000). Intraperitoneal
gossypibomas: the need to count sponges. World journal of surgery, 24(5), 521–527.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s002689910084.
[29] van Steensel, S., van den Hil, L., Schreinemacher, M.,
Ten Broek, R., van Goor, H., & Bouvy, N. D. (2018). Adhesion awareness in 2016:
An update of the national survey of surgeons. PloS one, 13(8), e0202418. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0202418.
[30] Ten Broek, R. P., Strik, C., Issa, Y., Bleichrodt, R. P.,
& van Goor, H. (2013). Adhesiolysis-related morbidity in abdominal surgery.
Annals of surgery, 258(1), 98–106. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e31826f4969.