Conceptual Framework for Epidemics and Vaccination Dilemma
Abstract:
Outbreaks
of diseases have positive and negative effects on humans. An example of the positive
epidemic dilemma was seen in the 2020 lockdown across the world where families spent
quality time together and couples seeking for the fruit of the womb conceived after
many years, working from home was introduced, Lagosians working from home reduced
stress from traffic, remote jobs were increased, online zoom, Webex webinars, online
surveys, seminars, conference, Viva Voca, graduation and growth for online business
and banking. Apps were available for the masses to access health online, known as
Telemedicine. While the negative epidemics dilemma includes loss of jobs, slow down
in economy across the world, poverty, drug abuse, self–medication, Anti-microbial
resistance, child abuse, rape, divorce, shadow pandemic, death, and no access to
education for those that do not have internet facilities to learn/study/school online.
Vaccine’s hesitancy is an established dilemma that contributes to significant health
challenges which cause a high rate of infant sickness and death. There are certain
factors like cultural, social, demographic, and psychosocial factors that contribute
to the vaccine dilemma. This conceptual framework illustrates the factors that drive
epidemics and vaccine dilemma, which can be vaccination acceptance and hesitancy.
For an intervention to be implemented successfully, we need to understand the triggers
of epidemics and vaccination dilemma. The socio-demographic characteristics like
age, sex, marital status, level of education, choice of hospital, employment status,
level of income, health insurance status and the number of children is significantly
associated with vaccine uptake among parents.
References:
[1] Osibogun (2014) “Emerging and Remerging
diseases – Stopping the spread”: Lecture delivered at the Health Week ceremony of
the University of Lagos.
[2]
Vaccinate your family, 2019, “Vaccines are
cost savings”, https://www.vaccinateyourfamily.org/why-vaccinate/vaccine-benefits/costs-of-disease-outbreaks/.
[3] De Figueiredo A et al. (2016) “Forecasted
trends in vaccination coverage and correlations with socioeconomic factors: A global
time-series analysis over 30 years”. Lancet Glob. Health, Vol 4, no. 10, pp., 726–735.
pmid:27569362 View Article PubMed/NCBI Google Scholar.
[4] Wessel L., (2017,) “Vaccine myths”. Science
2017; 356(6336):368–372. pmid:28450594 View Article PubMed/NCBI Google Scholar.
[5] Larson HJ, Jarrett C, Eckersberger E,
Smith DM, Paterson P., (2014), “Understanding vaccine hesitancy around vaccines
and vaccination from a global perspective: A systematic review of published literature”,
2007-2012. Vaccine 2014; 32(19):2150–2159. PMID: 24598724 View Article PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar.
[6] Black S, Rappuoli R., (2010), “A crisis
of public confidence in vaccines”. Sci. Transl. Med. 2010; Vol. 2, no. 61, pp.,
61. PMID: 21148125 View Article PubMed/NCBI Google Scholar.
[7] Larson HJ., (2016) “Vaccine trust and
the limits of information”. Science Vol. 353, no. 6305, pp., 1207–1208. PMID: 27634512
View Article PubMed/NCBI Google Scholar.
[8]
Holme
P, Saramäki J. (2012) “Temporal networks”. Phys Rep; no. 519, pp., 97–125.
[9]
Jansen
VAA et al., (2003), “Measles outbreaks in a population with declining vaccine uptake”.
Science Vol. 301, no. 5634, pp., 804. PMID: 12907792 View Article PubMed/NCBI Google
Scholar.
[10] Feh E, Fischbacher U., (2003), “The nature
of human altruism”. Nature Vol., 2003; no. 425, pp., 785–791. View Article Google
Scholar.
[11] Davis L., (1977), “Prisoners, paradox,
and rationality”. Am PhilosQ,Vol. 14, no. 4, pp., 319–327.View Article Google Scholar.
[12] Sharma A,
Menon SN, Sasidevan V, Sinha S (2019) “Epidemic prevalence information on social
networks can mediate emergent collective outcomes in voluntary vaccine schemes”.
PLoSComputBiolVol. 15, no. 5, e1006977. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006977.
[13] Verelst F, Willem L, Beutels P., (2016),
“Behavioural change models for infectious diseasetransmission: a systematic review
(2010-2015)”. J. R. Soc. Interface 2016; 13(125):20160820. pmid: 28003528 View Article
PubMed/NCBI Google Scholar.
[14]
Marien
González Lorenzo A,
Alessandra Piatti C, Liliana
Coppola C, Maria Gramegna C, Vittorio Demicheli D,
Alessia Melegaro E, Marcello Tirani A, Elena Parmelli
F.G, Francesco Auxilia A
Lorenzo Moja A.B, the Vaccine Decision Group, 2015, Conceptual
frameworks and key dimensions to support coverage decisions for vaccines, Volume 33,
Issue 9, 25 February 2015, Pages 1206-1217, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.12.020.
[15] Saint-Victor DS, Omer SB., (2013), “Vaccine
refusal and the endgame: Walking the last mile first”. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 2013;
368(1623):20120148. PMID: 23798696 View Article PubMed/NCBI Google Scholar.
[16] Bauch CT, Galvani AP, Earn DJD., (2003)
“Group interest versus self-interest in smallpox vaccination policy”. Proc. Natl.
Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 100, no.18, pp., 564–567. View Article Google Scholar.
[17] Bauch CT, Earn DJD., (2004) “Vaccination
and the theory of games”. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, Vol 101, no. 36, pp., 391–394.
View Article Google Scholar.
[18] Zhang H-F, Wu Z-X, Tang M, La Y-C., (2014),
“Effects of behavioral response and vaccination policy on epidemic spreading—an
approach based on evolutionary-game dynamics”. Sci. Rep. 2014; 4:5666. pmid: 25011424
View Article PubMed/NCBI Google Scholar.
[19] Verelst
F, Willem L, Kessels R, Beutels P., (2018), “Individual decisions to vaccinate one’s
child or oneself: A discrete choice experiment rejecting free-riding motives”. Soc.
Sci. Med. Vol. 2018; no. 207, pp., 106–116. pmid: 29738898.
[20] Jolley D, Douglas KM., (2014), “The effects
of anti-vaccine conspiracy theories on vaccination intentions”. PLoS ONE, Vol. 9,
no. 2, pp., 89 - 177. pmid:24586574 View Article PubMed/NCBI Google Scholar.
[21] Larson HJ, Ghinai I., (2011), “Lessons
from polio eradication”. Nature; no. 473, pp., 446–447. pmid:21614056 View Article
PubMed/NCBI Google Scholar.
[22] Eubank S, et al., (2004),
“Modelling disease outbreaks in realistic urban social networks”. Nature, Vol. 429,
no. 6988, pp., 180–184. pmid:15141212 View Article PubMed/NCBI Google Scholar.
[23] Moinet A, Pastor-Satorras R, Barrat Alain.,
(2018), “Effect of risk perception on epidemic spreading in temporal networks”.
Phy. Rev. E 2018; 97(1):012313. View Article Google Scholar.
[24] Rizzo A, Frasca M, Porfiri M., (2014),
“Effect of individual behavior on epidemic spreading in activity-driven networks”.
Phy. Rev. E Vol. 90, no. 4, 042801. View Article Google Scholar.
[25] Massaro E, Bagnoli F., (2014), “Epidemic
spreading and risk perception in multiplex networks: A self-organized percolation
method”. Phy. Rev. E 2014; Vol. 90, no. 5, 052817. View Article Google Scholar.
[26] Oku, A.,
Oyo-Ita, A., Glenton, C. et al. Factors affecting the implementation of childhood
vaccination communication strategies in Nigeria: a qualitative study. BMC Public
Health 17, 200 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4020-6.
[27] Harapan H, Wagner AL, Yufika A, Winardi W, Anwar
S, Gan AK, et al. (2020) Acceptance of a COVID-19 vaccine in Southeast Asia: a cross-sectional
study in Indonesia. Front Public Health. 8:381. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.00381PubMed Abstract, CrossRef
Full Text, Google
Scholar.
[28]
Wang
J, Jing R, Lai X, Zhang H, Lyu Y, Knoll MD, et al. (2020) Acceptance of COVID-19
vaccination during the COVID-19 pandemic in China. Vaccines. 8:482. DOI:
10.3390/vaccines8030482 PubMed
Abstract, CrossRef
Full Text, Google Scholar.
[29] Bell S, Clarke R, Mounier-Jack S, Walker JL,
Paterson P. (2020) Parents’ and guardians’ views on the acceptability of a future
COVID-19 vaccine: a multi-methods study in England. Vaccine. 38:7789–98.
doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.10.027 PubMed
Abstract, CrossRef Full Text, Google
Scholar.
[30] Reiter PL, Pennell ML, Katz ML. (2020) Acceptability
of a COVID-19 vaccine among adults in the United States: How many people would get
vaccinated? Vaccine. 38:6500–7. DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.08.043PubMed Abstract, CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar.
[31]
Guidry
JPD, Laestadius LI, Vraga EK, Miller CA, Perrin PB, Burton CW, et al. (2021) Willingness
to get the Covid-19 vaccine with and without emergency use authorization. Am
J Infect Control. 49:137–42. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajic.2020.11.018 PubMed Abstract, CrossRef
Full Text, Google Scholar.
[32] Dror AA, Eisenbach N, Taiber S, Morozov NG,
Mizrachi M, Zigron A, et al. (2020) Vaccine hesitancy: the next challenge in the
fight against COVID-19. Eur J Epidemiol. 35:775–9. DOI: 10.1007/s10654-020-00671-y
PubMed Abstract, CrossRef
Full Text, Google
Scholar.
[33] Goldman RD, Yan TD, Seiler M, Cotanda CP, Brown
JC, Klein EJ, et al. (2020) Caregiver willingness to vaccinate their children against
COVID-19: Cross-sectional survey. Vaccine. 38:7668–73. DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.09.084
PubMed Abstract, CrossRef
Full Text, Google
Scholar.
[34] Lazarus JV, Ratzan SC, Palayew A, Gostin LO,
Larson HJ, Rabin K, et al. (2021). A global survey of potential acceptance of a
COVID-19 vaccine. Nat Med. 27:225–8. DOI: 10.1038/s41591-020-1124-9 PubMed Abstract, CrossRef
Full Text, Google Scholar.
[35] Salali GD, Uysal MS. (2020) COVID-19 vaccine
hesitancy is associated with beliefs on the origin of the novel coronavirus in the
UK and Turkey. Psychol Med. 1−3. DOI: 10.1017/S0033291720004067 PubMed Abstract, CrossRef Full Text, Google Scholar.
[36]
Su
Z, Wen J, Abbas J, McDonnell D, Cheshmehzangi A, Li X, et al. (2020) A race for
a better understanding of COVID-19 vaccine non-adopters. Brain Behav Immun Health.
9:100159. doi: 10.1016/j.bbih.2020.100159 PubMed Abstract,
CrossRef Full Text, Google
Scholar.
[37] Joshi, A., Kaur, M., Kaur, R., Grover, A., Nash, D., & El-Mohandes,
A. (2021). Predictors of COVID-
19 Vaccine Acceptance, Intention, and Hesitancy: A Scoping Review. Frontiers
in public health, 9, 698111. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.698111.