Validity of Ziehl-Neelsen and LED Fluorescence Microscopy Technique in the Diagnosis of Mycobacterium Tuberculosis Infection among HIV Patients in Lafia, Nigeria, 2017
Abstract:
Tuberculosis (TB) is a public health
problem caused by the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex. An estimated 70% of TB
patients living with HIV are from sub-Saharan Africa largely depends on direct smear
microscopy light microscopy for TB diagnosis, which has low Sensitivity, especially
among HIV patients. Hence, we conducted this study to evaluate the Performance of
Auramine O LED Fluorescence microscopy and the Ziehl-Neelsen technique in Tuberculosis
among HIV-positive patients. The study was conducted using
a cross-sectional design among 107 consecutively selected HIV/AIDS patients with
presumptive Tuberculosis attending ART clinic in Dalhatu Araf Specialist Hospital
(DASH), Lafia, Nasarawa State. Three samples were collected from each patient in
two visits. Each sample was examined using ZN, LED FM, and Gene-Xpert. Data on socio-demographic
characteristics was collected from the subject participant. Univariate and bivariate
analyses were done using MS Excel and Epi Info. The Sensitivity and Specificity
were compared using McNemar’s chi-square. Seventy-three (68%) patients were female, 33 (30.8%) were in the age group 28-32
years, and 61 (56%) were employed. Ziehl-Neelsen and LED fluorescent microscopy
respectively yielded 11 (10.3%) and 15 (14.0%) positive results, while Gene-Xpert
gave 18 (16.3%). The Sensitivity for direct ZN and LED FM were 61.1% and 83.3 %,
respectively (P-value 0.01) with
100% specificity for both methods. LED microscopy has a much higher sensitivity
than ZN microscopy and would be a better alternative in the diagnosis of Tuberculosis
in high HIV settings where the use and expertise with culture and Gene-Xpert are
limited.
Keywords: HIV, LED Fluorescence, Sensitivity, Specificity, Ziehl-Neelsen
References:
[1] Clark M, Riben P,
Nowgesic E., (2002), The association of housing density, isolation and Tuberculosis
in Canadian First Nations communities. Int J Epidemiol. 31 (5): 940–5. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12435764/.
[2] Wanyeki I, Olson
S, Brassard P, Menzies D, Ross N, Behr M, et al. (2006), Dwellings, crowding,
and Tuberculosis in Montreal. Soc sci med. 63(2):16480805 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16480805/.
[3] Ndadilnasiya Endie
Waziri, Simeon Cadmus, Patrick Nguku, Olufunmilayo Fawole, Olajide Adewale
Owolodun, Hyelshilni Waziri, Luka Ibrahim, Oladayo Biya, Saheed Gidado, Samuel
Badung, Peterside Kumbish, Peter Nsubugan, (2014), Factors associated with
tuberculosis among patients attending a treatment centre in Zaria, North-west
Nigeria, Pan Afr Med J. 18 (Suppl 1) https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4199345/.
[4] Mangtani P, Jolley
DJ, Watson JM, Rodrigues LC. London during 1982-91. BMJ. 1995;310 (April):963–6.
https://www.bmj.com/content/310/6985/963.short.
[5] World Health
Organization. Global Tuberculosis Report, (2012) Available from: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/75938/1/9789241564502_eng.pdf
accessed 15 February 2017.
[6] March R, Goal MD,
Tb T, Strategy STB. Fact sheet N°104 Reviewed March (2014). Vol. 2014. https://www.who.int/tb/publications/global_report/gtbr15_main_text.pdf.
[7] Global
tuberculosis report (2014), WHO Library Cataloguing in Publication Data Global
tuberculosis report (2014).
https://www.who.int/tb/publications/global_report/gtbr14_main_text.pdfs.
[8] Mardani M. (2003),
TB-HIV Co-Infection. Vol. 2, https://www.sid.ir/en/Journal/ViewPaper.aspx?ID=168548.
[9] Teran R, Waard JH
de (2015), Recent Advances in the Laboratory Diagnosis of Tuberculosis. J Int
Fed Clin Chem Lab Med.26(4):295–309. https://www.ifcc.org/media/334114/eJIFCC2015Vol26No4pp295-309.pdf.
[10] Desikan P.2013,
Sputum smear microscopy in Tuberculosis: Is it still relevant? Indian J Med
Res.137(3):442–4. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3705651/.
[11] Steingart KR, Ng
V, Henry M, Hopewell PC, Ramsay A, Cunningham J, et al.2006, Sputum processing
methods to improve the sensitivity of smear microscopy for tuberculosis: a
systematic review. Lancet Infect Dis.6(10):664–74. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17008175/.
[12] Kakkar F, Allen
UD, Ling D, Pai M, Kitai IC, Society CP, et al.2010, Tuberculosis in children:
New diagnostic blood tests. Can Paediatr Soc.15(8):529–33.
https://academic.oup.com/pch/article-abstract/15/8/529/2639309.
[13] Steingart KR,
Ramsay A. 2007, Optimizing sputum smear microscopy for the diagnosis of. Expert
Rev Anti Infect Ther.5(3):327–31. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17547496/.
[14] Holani AG, Ganvir
SM, Shah NN, Bansode SC, Shende V, Jawade R, et al., (2014), Demonstration of
Mycobacterium Tuberculosis in sputum and saliva smears of tuberculosis patients
using Ziehl Neelsen and fluorochromes staining - A comparative study. J Clin
Diagnostic Res. 8(7):42–5. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25177636/.
[15] Prevention C for
DC and. Chapter 2 Transmission and Pathogenesis of Tuberculosis. In p. 19–44. https://www.cdc.gov/tb/education/corecurr/pdf/chapter2.pdf.
[16] Buderer NM. (1996),
Statistical methodology: I. Incorporating the prevalence of disease into the
sample size calculation for Sensitivity and. Acad Emerg Med. 3(9):8870764. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8870764/.
[17] Malhotra RK,
Indrayan A. (2007), Research Methodology A simple nomogram for the sample size
for estimating Sensitivity and Specificity of medical tests. Indian J
Ophthalmol.105:110–3. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20952837/.
[18] Cuevas LE,
Al-sonboli N, Lawson L, Yassin MA, Arbide I, Al-aghbari N, et al. (2011), LED
Fluorescence Microscopy for the Diagnosis of Pulmonary Tuberculosis: A
Multi-Country Cross-Sectional Evaluation. PLoS Med.8(7). https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.1001057.
[19] Cattamanchi A,
Dowdy DW, Davis JL, Worodria W, Yoo S, Joloba M, et al. (2009), Sensitivity of direct
versus concentrated sputum smear microscopy tuberculosis. 5:1–9. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19419537/.
[20] Daley P, Michael
JS, Kalaiselvan S, Latha A, Mathai D, John KR, et al. (2009), A pilot study of
short-duration sputum pretreatment procedures for optimizing smear microscopy
for Tuberculosis. PLoS One.4(5). https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0005626.
[21] Shenai S, Minion
J, Vadwai V, Tipnis T, Shetty S, Salvi A, et al. (2011), Evaluation of light-emitting
diode-based fluorescence microscopy for the detection of mycobacteria in a
tuberculosis-endemic region. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis.15(4):483–8. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21396207/.
[22] Uddin MKM,
Chowdhury MR, Ahmed S, Rahman MT, Khatun R, van Leth F, et al., (2013),
Comparison of direct versus concentrated smear microscopy in detection of
pulmonary Tuberculosis. BMC Res Notes 6:291. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23885922/.
[23] Monkongdee, P.,
McCarthy, K. D., Cain, K. P., Tasaneeyapan, T., Nguyen, H. D., Nguyen, T. N.,
Nguyen, T. B., Teeratakulpisarn, N., Udomsantisuk, N., Heilig, C., & Varma,
J. K. (2009), Yield of acid-fast smear and mycobacterial culture for
tuberculosis diagnosis in people with human immunodeficiency virus. American
journal of respiratory and critical care medicine, 180(9), 903–908. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19628775/.
[24] Githui W, Kitui F,
Juma ES, Obwana DO, Mwai J, Kwamanga D. (1993), A comparative study on the
reliability of the fluorescence microscopy and Ziehl-Neelsen method in the
diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis. East AfrMed J.70:263–6. https://europepmc.org/article/med/8306899.
[25] Bhalla M, Sidiq Z,
Sharma PP, Singhal R, Myneedu VP, Sarin R. (2013), Performance of
light-emitting diode fluorescence microscope for diagnosis of Tuberculosis. Int
J Mycobacteriology http://www.ijmyco.org/article.asp?issn=22125531;year=2013;volume=2;issue=3;spage=174;epage=178;aulast=Bhalla.
[26] Sharma SK, Kohli
M, Yadav RN, Chaubey J, Bhasin D, Sreenivas V, et al. (2015), Evaluating the
diagnostic accuracy of Xpert MTB/RIF assay in pulmonary Tuberculosis. PLoS
One.10(10):1–9. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26496123/.
[27] Agrawal M, Bajaj
A, Bhatia V, Dutt S. (2016), Comparative study of GeneXpert with ZN stain and
culture in samples of suspected pulmonary Tuberculosis. J Clin Diagnostic
Res.10(5): DC09-DC12. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27437212/.
[28] Rahman F, Munshi
SK, Kamal SMM, Rahman ASMM, Rahman MM, Noor R. (2011), Comparison of Different
Microscopic Methods with Conventional TB Culture. Stamford J
Microbiol.1(1):1–5. https://www.banglajol.info/index.php/SJM/article/view/9133.
[29] Cuevas LE1,
Al-Sonboli N, Lawson L, Yassin MA, Arbide I, Al-Aghbari N, et al, (2011), s LED
fluorescence microscopy for the diagnosis of pulmonary Tuberculosis: a
multi-country cross-sectional evaluation. PLoS Med. 2011;8(7). https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.1001057.