Knowledge and Perceived Health Risk on Cosmetic Lip Products amongst Female Undergraduate Students: A Mixed Method Study
Abstract:
The use of Cosmetic Lip Products (CLPs)
has historically been a fashion statement for women. However, the health risk associated
with CLPs has not been thoroughly investigated given that chemical analysis show
that CLPs may contain heavy metals injurious to health. This study is aimed at investigating
the knowledge and perception of the possible health risks associated with the use
of CLPs.
The study
adopted a mixed method study design. The descriptive cross-sectional study involved
390 participants drawn randomly from five female hostels. The qualitative method
involved four focus group discussions with ≥6 discussants per FGD recruited by snowballing
method and conducted using an FGD guide. Data were collected using a pre tested
semi-structured questionnaire which contained an 11-item knowledge scale and a 12-item
perception scale. A 22-points knowledge scale and 24 points perception scale were
utilized for the study. A Knowledge score
Age of respondents was 19.7±1.2 years.
Most discussants reported the potential health risk would not sway them from using
CLPs as they did not see CLPs as a threat to
their health. Majority (83.3%) had poor knowledge and poor perception
(59.2%) of the possible health risks associated with using CLPs.
It is recommended that campaigns using the internet to
buttress possible health risk associated with CLPs are embarked on by health advocacy
groups.
Keywords: Cosmetic Lip
Products, Female, Undergraduates, Health Risk.
References:
[1]. Ali S., Maryam Bello
G., Fatima Aliyu A. 2016. Determination of some heavy metals in selected cosmetic
products sold in Kano metropolis, Nigeria.
Elsevier Toxicology Reports Vol 3, Pg 866–869.
[2]. Airin Z. and Yu Bin
H. 2015. Heavy metals contamination in lipsticks and their associated health risks
to lipstick consumers. Elsevier Regulatory
Toxicology and Pharmacology Vol. 73, Pg. 191-195.
[3]. ARSO
Kenya 2015. Cosmetology and Wellness: A
Review of Practices, Products, Risks and the Standardization Needs for Africa. Sector
Standardization Needs Review.
[4]. Ayenimo J. G., Yusuf A. M., Adekunle A. S, and Makinde O.W. 2010.
Heavy metal exposure from personal care products. Bulletin of Environmental Contamination
and Toxicology Vol. 84, No. 1, Pg. 8–14.
[5].
Burns D. A., Breathnach S. M., Cox N. and Griffiths C. M. 2004.
Mass: Blackwell Science.
[6]. Edhayavarman C. S.,
and Sunderambal K. 2015. A Study on Brand Loyalty and Its Effect on Buying Behavior
in Pudukottai. Shanlax International Journal
of Management. Vol 3, No. 2.
[7]. Environmental Working
Group. 2012. Myths on cosmetics safety.
Retrieved from EWG Site http://www.ewg.org/skindeep/myths-on-cosmetics-safety/.
[8].
Future Market Insights 2017. Colour Cosmetic Market:
Lip Make-Up Segment projected to Gain Significant Revenue Share by 2026 over 2016:
Global Industry Analysis and Opportunity Assessment for 2016 – 2026.
[9]. Gondal M. A., Seddiqi
Z. S., and Nasr M. M., Gondal B. 2010. Spectroscopic detection of health hazardous
contaminants in lipstick using laser induced breakdown spectroscopy. J. Hazard. Mater Vol. 175, Pg. 726–732.
[10]. Grace G. 2016. Yahoo
Beauty: Black Women May Be Exposed to More Harmful Cosmetic Chemicals. Retrieved
5/5/2017:
https://www.yahoo.com/beauty/black-women-may-be-exposed
to-more-harmful-cosmetic-chemicals-060020567.html.
[11]. Health Canada 2011.
Toxic metals found in make-up cosmetics and the health risks of hidden heavy metals in face makeup: A report
released by Canadian Environmental Defense.Pg 23-26.
[12]. Heyam Ali., Rasha S.,
Ahmed A., and Babiker El-H. 2015. Attitudes and Perceptions of the Emirates Women
Towards Facial Skin Care Products and Herbal Cosmetics. International Journal of Current Pharmaceutical Review and Research
Vol. 6, No. 3Pg. 178-187.
[13]. Ilkay K. 2014. Factors Influencing Consumer Preferences
on Natural and Non-Natural Cosmetics in Turkey. International
Journal of Business and Management Studies Vol 6, No 1.
[14]. Katie B. 2016. ELLE:
15 Most Obsessed-over Beauty Products of 2016. Retrieved 5/5/2017 http://www.elle.com/beauty/makeup-skin-care/news/g29233/most-popular-makeup-products-of-2016/.
[15]. Kenneth A. H., Jennifer
F., and Bill D. 2011. Cultural and Social Influences on The Perception of Beauty:
A Case Analysis of the Cosmetics Industry.Journal
of Business case studies Vol. 1 No. 7.
[16]. Khalid A., Bukhari
I H., Riaz M., Rehman G., Ain Q. U., Bokhari T. H., Rasool N., Zubair M., Munir
S. 2013. Determination of lead, cadmium, chromium and nickel in different brands
of lipsticks. IJBPAS Vol. 2, Pg. 1003–1009.
[17]. Lisa Chan M., Stephanie
Chalupka M. and Roseann B. 2015. Female College Student Awareness of Exposures to
Environmental Toxins in Personal Care Products.
[18]. Parisa Z., Saba M.,
Sepideh Arbabi-B., and Mahnaz Q. (2012). RiskAssessment of Heavy Metal Contents
(Lead andCadmium) in Lipsticks in Iran. International Journal of Chemical Engineering
and ApplicationsVol. 3, No. 6.
[19]. Piccinini P., Piecha
M., and Torrent S.F. 2013. European survey on the content of lead in lip products
J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. Vol. 76, Pg. 225-233.
[20].
Rebecca
S., and Melanie V. 2010. The Chemistry of Cosmetics Activity Guide.
[21]. Sankaranarayanan K
G. 2014. Influence of
Demographic variables on the consumption of cosmetic products. Journal of Radix International Educational and
Research Consortium Vol 3, No. 6.
[22]. Shikha B. C., Aditee C., and Agrawal S.S 2014. Evaluation of Heavy Metals
contamination in Marketed Lipsticks, International Journal
of Advanced Research,
Vol. 2, No. 4, Pg. 257-262.
[23]. Soares A. R., Nascentes
C. C. 2013. Development of a simple method for the determination of lead in lipstick
using alkaline solubilization and graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry.
Talanta Vol. 05, Pg. 272–277.
[24]. United States Food
and Drug Administration (USFDA) 2013. United States Department of Health and Human
Services. Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act.