Factors Associated with Health-care Service Delay in Diagnosis among Tuberculosis Patients in National Tuberculosis and Leprosy Training Centre in Zaria-Nigeria
Abstract:
Background: Any
delay in diagnosis and consequently treatment of TB patients not only increases
the infectivity of the disease in the community, but may lead to more advance
disease state, which may result in more complications and expose patients to
higher risk of death. Objectives To
assess delays in diagnosing new TB patients and the factors associated with
these delays in NTBLTC
Zaria, Nigeria. Methods: The study population was TB patients attending the NTBLTC, Zaria. Analysis of contingency tables was
done and Chi-square statistics were used to test for association between variables
and level of significance. Logistic regression was used to calculate the odd
ratio. Results: Age, marital
status, economic status, sex, education, and alcohol consumption were
significantly (P<0.05) associated with patient delays while smoking and CD4
count were statistically not significant with patient delays. Female (OR=1.046;
1.04-2.17), literacy (OR=1.02; 0.29-1.98) and single (OR=1.00; 0.14-4.67) were
the major determinants that influence extended patient delay. Age, economic
status, education, smoking and alcohol consumption were significantly
(P<0.05) associated with health system delays while sex, marital status and
CD4 count were statistically not significant with health system delays. Conclusion: Factors
associated with delay in seeking health care for more than 30 days included
age, sex, marital status, economic status, education, smoking and alcohol
intake while for patient delay includes age, sex, marital status, economic
status, education and alcohol intake. This factor should be taken into
consideration for policy planning to help the containment of the spread of the
disease.
Keywords: Health
care service delay, cross-sectional, odd ratio, tuberculosis, Logistic
regression, patient delay.
References:
[1].
Atre SR et al. (2004). Cultural concepts
of tuberculosis and gender among the general population without tuberculosis in
rural Maharashtra, India. Trop Med Int Health, 9(11):1228–38.
[2].
Fazlul K, Akramul I, Chowdhury A,
Johansson E, Diwan C. (2007). Gender differences in delays in diagnosis and
treatment of tuberculosis. Health Policy Plan, 329–34.
[3].
Federal Ministry of
Health, Department of Public Health. National tuberculosis and leprosy control
programme: workers manual. 5. Abuja, Nigeria: Federal Ministry of Health; 2010.
[4].
Horwitz, L.I., Green, J. & Bradley, E.
H., (2010). US Emergency Department Performance on Wait Time and Length of
Visit. Annals of Emergency Medicine, 55(2), pp.133– 141.
[5].
IAR.
(2013). Meteorological Service Unit, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria.
[6].
Lawn S. D, Afful B, Acheampong J. W. (1998).
Pulmonary tuberculosis: diagnostic delay in Ghanaian adults. Int J Tuberc Lung
Dis, 2(8):635–40.
[7].
Maluwa VM1, Andre J, Ndebele P, Chilemba
E. (2012). Moral distress in nursing practice in Malawi. Nurs Ethics. Mar; 19 (2):196-207. doi: 10.1177/0969733011414968.
[8].
Mardiah, F. P. & Basri, M.H., (2013).
The Analysis of Appointment System to Reduce Outpatient Waiting Time at
Indonesia’s Public Hospital: Human Resource Management Research 3(1): 27-33,
doi:10.5923/j.hrmr.20130301.06
[9].
Musinguzi, C., (2015). Patient waiting
time and associated factors at the Assessment Center, General out-patient Department
Mulago Hospital Uganda. (October).
[10]. Ngadaya
S. E, Mfinanga S. G, Wandwalo R. E, Morkve O. (2009): Delay in Tuberculosis case detection in Pwani region, Tanzania, a
cross-sectional study. BMC Health Services
Research. 9:196 https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-9-196
[11]. Oche, M. & Adamu, H. (2013). Determinants of patient waiting
time in the general outpatient department of a tertiary health institution in
north Western Nigeria.
Annals of medical and health sciences research, 3(4), pp.588–592
[12]. Odusanya
O. O, Babafemi J. O. (2004). Patterns of delays amongst pulmonary tuberculosis
patients in Lagos, Nigeria. BMC Public Health, 4:18.
[13]. Okotie, O.T., Patel, N. & Gonzalez, C. M., (2008). The effect
of patient arrival time on overall wait time and utilization of physician and
examination room resources in the outpatient urology clinic. Advances in
urology, p.507436.
[14]. Umar,
I., Oche, M. O., & Umar, A. S. (2011). Patient waiting time in a tertiary
health institution in Northern Nigeria. Journal of Public Health and
Epidemiology, 3(2), pp.78–82. Available at:
http://www.academicjournals.org/jphe.
[15]. Storla,
D. G., Yimer S, Bjune G. A. A. (2008). Systematic review of delay in the
diagnosis and treatment of tuberculosis. BMC
Public Health. I8:15.
[16]. Shuster, J.J. (1990). Handbook of Sample Size
Guidelines for Clinical Trials, Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press
[17]. Wandera
M. N., Onyango R., & Kakai R. (2014). Determinants of Clients’ Satisfaction
with healthcare Services at Pumwani Maternity Hospital in Nairibi-Kenya. International Journal of Social &
Behavioural Sciences. Vol. 2 (1), pp. 011 – 017.
[18]. Wanyenze
RK1, Wagner G, Alamo S, Amanyire G, Ouma J, Kwarisima D, Sunday P,
Wabwire-Mangen F, Kamya M. (2010) Evaluation of the efficiency of patient flow
at three HIV clinics in Uganda. AIDS
Patient Care STDS. 2010 Jul; 24 (7):441-6. doi: 10.1089/apc.2009.0328.
[19]. WHO. (2006).
Diagnostic and treatment delay in tuberculosis. An in-depth analysis of the
health-seeking behaviour of patients and health system response in seven
countries of the eastern mediterranean region. Regional Officer for the Eastern
mediterranean, Cairo, World Health
Organization.
[20]. WHO. (2015).
Tuberculosis Fact sheet N°104 Reviewed March 2015 [Internet]. 2015. Available
from: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs104/en.
[21]. Yeboah,
E. & Thomas, M. (2009). A cost-effective way of reducing outpatient clinic
waiting times: How we did it., 7(1),
pp.6–9
[22]. Whyte, E. & Goodacre, S. (2016). Patient expectations of
emergency hospital admission: a cross-sectional questionnaire survey. European
journal of emergency medicine:
official journal of the European Society for Emergency Medicine, 23(3),
pp.203– 207.