Improving Male Attendance in Antenatal Clinics through Reduction in Delivery Fees as Incentives for their Pregnant Spouses: a Case Study in Rivers State, Nigeria
Abstract:
Background: Despite increases in reproductive health
interventions that target male involvement in maternal health, there are still evidences
to show that male spouses for some reasons do not support their spouses during antenatal
care sessions. This would otherwise serve as an avenue for health education and
ensure males can support their spouses through the antennal period and in child
birth. The
Objective: The purpose of the study was to ascertain
levels of participation of male spouses in antenatal clinics and the effect of reducing
cost of delivery to improving male antenatal attendance. Materials and Methods: This descriptive cross-sectional study was undertaken
in Port Harcourt and Obio-akpor Local Government Areas in Rivers State, Nigeria.
Semi-structured questionnaires were used to collect information from pregnant women,
male spouses, healthcare workers and Medical directors. Results:
Notably following interviews was that both male and pregnant women alike were aligned
to the thinking that women were generally more likely to be concerned about antenatal
care than men. Secondly reducing the amount for delivery during child birth by health
care providers drastically increased the number of men attending antenatal clinics
with their spouses. Conclusion: The study
has shown that incentives for men during antenatal care can serve as a strategy
for improving maternal outcomes during child birth. Notably is that there is need
for continued strategies to ensure male involvement in antenatal care to improve
health education especially in low resource settings.
Keywords:
Improving male attendance in antenatal
clinics
References:
[1]. Carter M. Husbands and maternal health
matters in rural Guatemala: wives' reports on their spouses' involvement in pregnancy
and birth. Soc Sci Med. 2002; 55(3):437–50. PMID: 12144151
[2]. Dudgeon MR, Inhorn MC. Men's influences
on women's reproductive health: medical anthropological perspectives. Soc Sci Med.
2004; 59(7):1379–95. PMID 51246168
[3].
JHPIEGO. Maternal and Neonatal health (MNH) program, birth preparedness
and complication readiness: A matrix of shared responsibilities. Maternal and Neonatal
Health. 2001. pp. 23–31.
[4].
McPherson RA, Khadka N, Moore JM, Sharma M. Are birth-preparedness
programmes effective? Results from a field trial in Siraha district, Nepal. Journal
of Health Population and Nutrition. 2006; 24(4):479–88. [PMC
free article] [PubMed]
[5]. WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA, the World Bank, the
United Nations Population Division. Trends in Maternal Mortality: 1990 to 2013.
Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2014.
[6]. World Health Organization. Maternal death
surveillance and response: Technical guidance information for action to prevent
maternal death. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2013.
[7]. World Health Organization. Women and
Health: Today's Evidence, Tomorrow's Agenda. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization;
2009.