The Investment Process: Reflections on the Public Sector of Guyana
Abstract:
The
decision to invest is one of the most complex choices made by managers in both
the private and public sectors globally. It involves not only initial expenses
but also cash flows throughout the investment’s useful life, all while bearing
inherent risks. A well-structured investment decision requires thorough
evaluation processes that consider economic, social, and environmental factors
to ensure sustainability and efficiency. In the public sector, investment
projects are critical for driving national development and improving the
quality of life for citizens, particularly in developing countries like Guyana.
These projects typically involve infrastructure development, technology
acquisition, and capacity building, all aimed at addressing pressing societal
needs. The study and proper conceptualization of these projects are therefore
crucial, as errors in planning or execution can lead to resource wastage and
missed opportunities. This article aims to reflect on the investment process,
with a particular focus on Guyana’s public sector. To achieve this, we employed
theoretical and empirical research methods, including analysis and synthesis,
induction, deduction, logical history, and documentary analysis. The research
draws insights from the National Public Investment System (NPIS) of Guyana,
which emphasizes structured planning and multi-year budgeting to optimize
resource utilization. The study concludes that in public sector investment
projects, it is essential to consider not only activities, tasks, resource
allocation, and economic or environmental impacts, but also the lasting social
benefits that extend beyond the project itself. These benefits must align with
national development goals, ensuring equity, inclusivity, and sustainable
growth for future generations.
References:
[1]. Alarcón,
A. D., Cruz, A., & Gutiérrez, R., 2020, Reflections on the evaluation of
the investment process: particularities in Cuba. Revista cubana de Ciencias
Económicas EKOTEMAS, 6 (1), 97-111. https://www.ekotemas.cu/index.php/ekotemas/article/view/19
[2]. Ameijide,
L., 2016, Project management according to PMI (engineering thesis). Open
University of Catalonia, Barcelona, Spain.
[3]. Baca,
G., 2010, Project Evaluation (6th ed.). Mexico City, McGraw Hill.
[4]. Carretero,
Y., & Alarcón, A., 2015, Theoretical trends in capital budgeting decisions.
Revista cubana de Contabilidad y Finanzas COFIN HABANA, 9(2), 92-99.
[5]. CEPAL.
2020, Conceptual and analytical framework. Systematization of national public
investment systems. Regional Observatory for Planning for the development of
Latin America and the Caribbean. https://observatorioplanificacion.cepal.org/ses/marco-conceptua-inversión-publica
[6]. Cohen,
E. & Martínez, R. (n.d.). Manual. Formulation, evaluation, and monitoring
of social projects. Santiago de Chile, Division of Social Development, CEPAL. https://dds.cepal.org/redesoc/archivos_recursos/242/Manual_dds_200408.pdf
[7]. Contreras,
E., & Diez, C., 2015, Design and Evaluation of Projects: an integrated
approach. University of Chile.
[8]. De
Kelety, A., 1990, Analysis and evaluation of investments. Madrid, EADA. ISBN:
9788486703257.
[9]. Demestre,
A., Castells, C., & González, A., 2006, Financial decisions: a business
necessity. Havana, PubliCentro Editorial Group. ISBN: 9789597176060.
[10]. Lall,
S., & Alarcón, A. D., 2019, Public investment projects: particularities for
Guyana. Revista cubana EKOTEMAS, 5(2), 79-89. https://www.ekotemas.cu/index.php/ekotemas/article/view/67
[11]. Mata,
M., 2016, Financial management of the agricultural investment project cycle.
Camagüey (doctoral thesis). University of Camagüey, Cuba.
[12]. Méndez,
R., 2020, Formulation and evaluation of projects: focus for entrepreneurs (10th
ed.). Bogotá, Ecoe Editions.
[13]. MIDEPLAN
2011, Methodology for evaluating the impact of public investment projects.
Chile, EMG Consultores for MIDEPLAN.
[14]. Ortegón,
E., Pacheco, J. F., & Prieto, A., 2023, Logical framework methodology for
planning, monitoring, and evaluating projects and programs. Series Manuals.
Santiago de Chile, United Nations, CEPAL.
[15]. PADID
2014, PADID Guide. https://www.studocu.com/ec/document/universidad-tecnologica-ecotec/sanitaria-de-emergencia/guia-padid-2014-articulos/45858069
[16]. Peumans,
H., 1967, Project investment valuation. Bilbao, Editions Deusto.
[17]. Planning
and Programming Secretariat of the Presidency (2019). Conceptual framework of
the National Public Investment System. Guatemala, SEGEPLAN. ISBN:
978-9929-692-30-5. https://sistemas.segeplan.gob.gt/sche$sinip/documentos/Marco_Conceptual_2019.pdf
[18]. Project
Management Institute 2017, A guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge:
PMBOK Guide (6th ed.). Pennsylvania, Project Management Institute. ISBN:
978-1-62825-184-5.
[19]. Reyes,
J. L., 2011, Investment projects (bachelor’s thesis). Autonomous University of
the State of Hidalgo, Tepeji del Río School, Mexico. Tepejí del Río School.
[20]. Rodríguez,
G., 2006, Financial and social evaluation of investment projects (3rd ed.).
Faculty of Economics, University of Havana.
[21]. Román,
M. E., 2006, Design and evaluation of agricultural projects. Editorial Faculty
of Agronomy, University of Buenos Aires. ISBN: 9789502906416.
[22]. Rosales,
R., 2006, Formulation and evaluation of projects (4th reprint). San José, Costa
Rica, ICAP. ISBN: 9977-20-036-X.
[23]. Suto,
F., 2014, The process of evaluating public investment projects (PIP). Connection
ESAN (web portal). ESAN Graduate School of Business, Peru
[24]. Tarragó,
F. J., 1986, Fundamentals of business economics. Barcelona, F. Tarragó, DL.
ISBN: 84-398-7910-5.
[25]. Van
Horne, J., 1995, Financial management. Mexico, Prentice Hall.
Demestre, A.; Castells, C. & González, A. (2006). Financial decisions: a
business necessity. Havana, PubliCentro Editorial Group.
