Mining Sector in South Africa: An Individual Perception on Open Strategy
Abstract:
This study aimed to investigate a positive approach to
mining innovation and growth, as well as the effectiveness of open strategy as a
practical solution to strategic management in South Africa. Through mixed-method
research design, both qualitative and quantitative data analysis were performed
using NVivo and SPSS software. The sampling frame included 20
interviews with highly knowledgeable participants and 205 online survey responses
collected from participants established in medium to large size mining companies,
shareholders, government /DMRE (Department of Mineral resources and Energy), MCSA
(Mineral Council of South Africa), mines employees. The findings revealed that there was a statistically
significant positive correlation between mining employee engagement and perceived
advantages of open strategy (p<0.01), stakeholders' and workers' perspectives
on open strategy, and how it may create transparency among them. Perceptions of
open strategy have a significant association with the mining industry's ability
for economic growth and job creation, as well as its relevance in ensuring organizational
continuity. Many mines are ‘spreadsheet’ wealth driven. Most of which started with
a plan and then been drawn into operational minutiae for the drive of self-sustaining
operations-driven cash flow and losing sight of the strategic imperatives, with
no or little reference to employee insights let alone anyone outside the organization.
The open strategy calls on and seeks outside influence. Conclusively, this study
gave relevant evidence that the mining industry should adopt an open strategy to
increase worker participation, success, and economic growth while reducing false
assumptions.
References:
[1] Burger, F.J., Pelser, T.G. and Ellis, S., 2019.
Organizational alignment of South African mining organizations. South African Journal
of Business Management, 50(1), 1-14.
[2] Winkler, H. and Black, A., 2021. Creating employment
and reducing emissions: Options for South Africa. SARCHl Industrial Development
Working Paper, 2021-06.
[3] Bersin, J., 2013, Building A Strong Talent Pipeline
for The Global Economic Recovery-Time for Innovative and Integrated Talent and HR
Strategies Predictions for 2014. Date of Access 04-12-2023 www.bersin.com/membership.
[4] Lane, A., Guzek, J. and van Antwerpen, W. 2015,
Tough choices facing the South African mining industry. Journal of the Southern
African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, [Online] 115(6), pp. 471–479. Available
at: http://www.scielo.org.za/scielo.php?pid=S2225-62532015000600006&script=sci_abstract
[5] [Accessed 28 Dec. 2023].
[6] Michener, G. and Bersch, K. 2013. Identifying Transparency.
[online] Ssrn.com. Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3290813
[Accessed 28 Dec. 2023].
[7] Meijer, A., T Hart, P. and Worthy, B. 2015. Assessing
Government Transparency: An Interpretive Framework. Administration & Society,
50(4), pp.501–526. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399715598341.
[8] Parris, D. L., Dapko, J. L., Arnold, R. W. and Arnold,
D. 2016, Exploring transparency: a New Framework for Responsible Business Management.
Management Decision, 54(1), pp. 222–247. https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/MD-07-2015-0279/full/html.
[9] Akadiri, P. O. and Olomolaiye, P. O., 2012. Development
of sustainable assessment criteria for building materials selection. Engineering,
Construction and Architectural Management, 19(6), pp. 666–687. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/09699981211277568.
[10] Friis, O., Uhrskov, I. and Holmgren, J., 2023. Aalborg
Universitet Open strategy Effects of inclusion Open strategy: Effects of inclusion,
Vol. 31. https://vbn.aau.dk/ws/portalfiles/portal/267518708/EGOS2017CPH_st50_full_Friis_Ole_open_strategy.pdf.
[11] South African Institute of International Affairs
2023. SADC Futures of Mining: Implications of Large-Scale EV Adoption on JSTOR.
[Online] Jstor.org. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/resrep29535.
[12] Sánchez, F. and Hartlieb, P. 2020. Innovation in
the Mining Industry: Technological Trends and a Case Study of the Challenges of
Disruptive Innovation. Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration, 37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42461-020-00262-1.
[13] Mariappanadar, S., Maurer, I., Kramar, R. and Muller-Camen,
M. 2021. Is it a sententious claim? An examination of the quality of occupational
health, safety and well-being disclosures in global reporting initiative reports
across industries and countries. International Business Review, p. 101922. DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2021.101922.
[14] Haumer, F., Schlicker, L., Murschetz, P. C. and
Kolo, C, 2021. Tailor the message and change will happen. An experimental study
of message tailoring as an effective communication strategy for organizational change.
Journal of Strategy and Management, 14 (4), pp. 426-443. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/jsma-08-2020-0207.
[15] Urbinati, A., Landoni, P., Cococcioni, F. and De
Giudici, L. 2020. Stakeholder management in open innovation projects: a multiple
case study analysis. European Journal of Innovation Management, 24 (5), pp.
1595-1624. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/ejim-03-2020-0076.
[16] Maponga, O.P. and Musa, C. 2020. Domestication of
the role of the mining sector in Southern Africa through local content requirements.
The Extractive Industries and Society. 8 (1), pp 195-210, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2020.06.001.
[17] Li, W., Yigitcanlar, T., Browne, W. and Nili, A.
2023. The Making of Responsible Innovation and Technology: An Overview and Framework.
Smart Cities, [Online] 6(4), pp.1996–2034. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities6040093.
[18] Weigt-Rohrbeck, J. and Linneberg, M. S. 2019. Democratizing
innovation processes: personal initiative in bottom-up eco-innovation. European
Journal of Innovation Management, 22(5), pp. 821–844. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/ejim-12-2018-0278.
[19] Cabrera Alvarado, S. 2023, The Importance of ALCE’s
Role as a Political Actor Rather Than a Coordinator of Regional Space Activities.
Space Policy, [Online] p. 101578. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spacepol.2023.101578.
[20] Phaladi, M. and Ngulube, P. 2022, Mitigating risks
of tacit knowledge loss in state-owned enterprises in South Africa through knowledge
management practices. SA Journal of Information Management, 24(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/sajim.v24i1.1462.
[21] Wang, M., Yan, H., Ciabuschi, F. and Su, C., 2023.
Facilitator or inhibitor? The effect of host-country intellectual property rights
protection on China’s technology-driven acquisitions. International Business Review,
32 (6), p. 102165. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2023.102165.