Abstract:

Despite the assumed added value of localization, what remains unclear is the method and framework within which local non-governmental organization (NGO) strategies are measured. Owing to considerable difference between donor demands and local stakeholder’s requirements, local NGO evaluation landscape in many developing countries including Uganda is characterized by disrupted systematic application of evaluation practices and standards. While there are considerable congregation towards ensuring standard evaluation, various evaluation models and frameworks; the proliferation of different donor donors’ framework is increasingly making strategy evaluation as subject of varied imagination against localized norms and standards. This study sought to validate the contextual relevance of organizational evaluation competency (OEC) framework as a standard process upon which local NGOs could meaningfully be seen to contribute to the realization of national development plan and aspirations. In-depth key informant interviews were conducted with 16 respondents drawn from NGO executives, NGO managers, board members, consultants, and academicians from a wider spectrum of specializations. Findings revealed that the OEC framework is contextually relevant for strategy evaluation. Specifically, the findings revealed that matured NGOs strategies were positively impacted by utilization OEC framework as they consistently apply it compared to emerging new local NGO. The study highlight higher potentials in wider application of OEC framework by both matured and emerging NGOs. This implies policy engagement on capacity strengthening must urgently prioritize NGO network support towards a strengthened evaluation technical expertise and steering.

References:

[1] Lingan, J., Cavender, A., Lloyd, R., & Gwynne, B. (2009). Responding to NGO development effectiveness initiatives. One World Trust/World Vision Briefing Paper, 122(122), 1-20.

[2] Dicklitch, S. (1998). The elusive promise of NGOs in Africa: Lessons from Uganda. Springer.

[3] Andres-Jimenez, J., Medina-Merodio, J. A., Fernandez-Sanz, L., Martinez-Herraiz, J. J., & Ruiz-Pardo, E. (2020). An Intelligent Framework for the Evaluation of Compliance with the Requirements of ISO 9001: 2015. Sustainability, 12(13),

[4] Fasuluku, S. O. (2021). Civil society in Kono District, Sierra Leone: Capacity, constraints, and potential to contribute to local Sustainable Development Goals. OSF Preprints, 18.

[5] Wagner, J. (1993). Perspectives on environmental conflict and international politics.

[6] Staron, M., Meding, W., & Nilsson, C. (2009). A framework for developing measurement systems and its industrial evaluation. Information and Software Technology, 51(4), 721-737.

[7] Martz, W. A. (2008). Evaluating organizational effectiveness. Western Michigan University.

[8] Tavana, M., & Banerjee, S. (1995). Evaluating strategic alternatives: an analytical model. Computers & operations research, 22(7), 731-743.

[9] Pondy, L. R., & Mitroff, I. I. (1979). Beyond open system models of organization. Research in organizational behavior, 1(1), 3-39.

[10] DeJong, D. J. (2009). Quality improvement using the Baldrige criteria for organizational performance excellence. American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy, 66(11), 1031-1034.

[11] Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (2008). Mastering the management system. Harvard business review, 86(1), 62.

[12] Escrig‐Tena, A. B., & Bou‐Llusar, J. C. (2005). A model for evaluating organizational competencies: An application in the context of a quality management initiative. Decision Sciences, 36(2), 221-257.

[13] Rodinova, N., Ostroukhov, V. M., Dibrova, J. N., Zaitseva, N. A., Larionova, A., & Yazev, G. (2017). Application of the competency model for assessing the effectiveness of the organizational structure in commercial organization. Man in India, 97(15), 331-341.

[14] Stufflebeam, D. L. (2000). Guidelines for developing evaluation checklists: the checklists development checklist (CDC). Kalamazoo, MI: The Evaluation Center Retrieved on January 16, 2008.

[15] Kang, J., Anderson, S. G., & Finnegan, D. (2012). The evaluation practices of US international NGOs. Development in Practice, 22(3), 317-333.

[16] Young, J. O. (2001). A defence of the coherence theory of truth. Journal of philosophical research, 26, 89-101.

[17] Kelly, L. M., & Cordeiro, M. (2020). Three principles of pragmatism for research on organizational processes. Methodological innovations, 13(2), 2059799120937242

[18] Uganda national NGO Forum (2021). The NGO blueprint. Strategic Plan 2021-2025. Accessed from https://ngoforum.or.ug/sites/default/files/publications/THE%20NGO%20BLUEPRINT%20-%20UNNGOF%20STRATEGIC%20PLAN%202021%20-2025.pdf

[19] Korten, D. C. (1987). Third generation NGO strategies: A key to people-centered development. World development, 15, 145-159.

[20] Jacobson, C., Hughey, K. F., Allen, W. J., Rixecker, S., & Carter, R. W. (2009). Toward more
reflexive use of adaptive management. Society and Natural Resources, 22(5), 484-495.

[21]  Barr, A., & Fafchamps, M. (2006). A client-community assessment of the NGO sector in Uganda. The Journal of Development Studies, 42(4), 611-639.