The Prevalence of Locally Owned Enterprises and Their Role in Economic Growth and Development in Chipata District of Zambia
Abstract:
Enterprise development
is key in driving the growth of the local economies around the global. Economic
growth is an important factor when it trickles down and triggers the availability
of jobs, wealth creation, and improved standards of living. The study aimed at assessing
the role of entrepreneurship in economic growth and development of Chipata district
of Zambia. The objectives of the study included; an investigation of the prevalence
of locally owned business enterprises in Chipata district, establishment of the
types of activities to which entrepreneurs are involved, an examination of the business
growth and to find out how the local entrepreneurial activities were helping people
in poverty alleviation in Chipata district. The study was limited to Small and Medium
Enterprises (SMEs) in Chipata district; town centre. The study implored a case study
design to address the research questions. Questionnaires were used as means of collecting
data from the business owners. The study sampled 60 business units in Chipata district.
The sample was identified by means of specific purposive sampling. All ethical considerations
were taken into account. The findings of the study revealed that most business organisations
were male gender dominated, sole proprietors and had financial challenges. It was
further established that agriculture was the major business activity. Arising from
the findings above, the study recommends that Government should devise a deliberate
policy that would help finance SMEs, and waive taxes and levies on start-up SMEs.
Keywords: Entrepreneurship, Small Medium Enterprises,
Economic Growth.
References:
[1]. Acs,
Z. J., & Naudé, W. (2013). Entrepreneurship, Stages of Development, and Industrialization.
doi: doi:10.1093/acprof: oso/9780199667857.003.0014.
[2]. Brück,
T., Naudé, W., & Verwimp, P. (2011). Small business, entrepreneurship and violent
conflict in developing countries. Journal of Small Business & Entrepreneurship,
24(2), 161-178.
[3]. Bruton,
G. D., Ahlstrom, D., & Obloj, K. (2008). Entrepreneurship in emerging economies:
Where are we today and where should the research go in the future. Entrepreneurship
theory and practice, 32(1), 1-14.
[4]. Creswell,
J. W. (2013). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches.
4th.
[5]. Ghosh,
B. N. (2012). Scientific Methods and Social Research.
[6]. Gries,
T., & Naudé, W. (2011). Entrepreneurship and human development: A capability
approach. Journal of Public Economics, 95(3-4), 216-224. Retrieved from https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/54146/1/636615812.pdf.
[7]. Kannebley,
S., Sekkel, J. V., & Araújo, B. C. (2010). Economic performance of Brazilian
manufacturing firms: a counterfactual analysis of innovation impacts. Small Business
Economics, 34(3), 339-353.
[8]. Kim,
Y., Kim, W., & Yang, T. (2010). The effect of public policy on entrepreneurial
activity: Evidence from OECD countries. Paper presented at the ICSB World Conference
Proceedings.
[9]. Lambert,
L., & Pasha-Zaidi, N. (2014). Happiness strategies among Arab university students
in the United Arab Emirates. Journal of Happiness and Well- Being, 2(1),
131-144.
[10]. Lerner,
J. (2009). Boulevard of broken dreams: why public efforts to boost entrepreneurship
and venture capital have failed--and what to do about it: Princeton University Press.
[11]. Ollila,
S., & Williams-Middleton, K. (2011). The venture creation approach: integrating
entrepreneurial education and incubation at the university. International Journal
of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, 13(2), 161-178. Retrieved from http://publications.lib.chalmers.se/records/fulltext/local_137897.pdf.
[12]. Stam,
E., & Wennberg, K. (2009). The roles of R&D in new firm growth. Small Business
Economics, 33(1), 77-89. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2Fs11187-009-9183-9.pdf.
[13]. Szirmai,
A., Naudé, W., & Alcorta, L. (2013). Pathways to industrialization in the twenty-first
century: new challenges and emerging paradigms: OUP Oxford.
[14]. Todaro,
M. P., & Smith, S. C. (2011). Economic Development. 11th.
[15]. Wennekers,
S., Van Stel, A., Carree, M., & Thurik, R. (2010). The relationship between
entrepreneurship and economic development: Is it U-shaped? Foundations and Trends®
in Entrepreneurship, 6(3), 167-237.
[16]. Yueh,
L. (2009). China’s entrepreneurs. World Development, 37(4), 778-786. Retrieved from
https://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:1e71b54c-aa17-4fef-a00087cd831267a9/download_file?file_format=application/pdf&safe_filename=Item.pdf&type_of_work=Working%20paper.
[17]. Zahra, S. A., Gedajlovic, E., Neubaum, D. O., & Shulman, J. M. (2009). A typology of social entrepreneurs: Motives, search processes and ethical challenges. Journal of business venturing, 24(5), 519-532. Retrieved from
https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Donald_Neubaum/publication/257984214_JBV_-_Social_Entrepreneurship/links/0deec52684004df74e000000.pdf.