Mitigating Lung Infections in Poor HIV Patients

Download Article

DOI: 10.21522/TIJCR.2014.03.02.Art003

Authors : Lois Collie-Acasio

Abstract:

Critical Appraisal of head-to-head studies is an important decision-making skill. Questions followed by evidence statements are responses that give researchers the evidence-based information they need to make decisions on the best treatment for an indication. The lung is the organ that HIV most frequently infects, and respiratory complications, such as pneumonia, are a common cause of death. The question of interest is: “Which of two treatments is the best one to mitigate lung infections in poor HIV patients?” This paper is a critical appraisal done to find an antibiotic that may be best for poverty-stricken HIV patients with pneumonia. There have been many reports of substandard drugs being donated to poorer countries. Critical appraisals need to be done on certain drugs that are donated to poverty-stricken countries to see if the drug is cost-effective, useful and affordable. It should be unethical to donate useless drugs to vulnerable poor HIV patients with lung infections.

KeywordsCritical appraisal, Decisionmaking, Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) 

References:

[1]. Aviram Galit and Phillip M. Boiselle (2004) Imaging Features of Bacterial Respiratory Infections in AIDS: Current Opinion Pulmonary Medicine, 10(3) [Online] Available at http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/475231_2 (Accessed 15 September 2016)

[2]. Cordero, E., Bouza, E., Ruiz, I., Pachon, J. (2001). Cefepime versus cefotaxime for empirical treatment of bacterial pneumonia in HIV-infected patients: an open, randomized trial. J Antimicrob Chemother 48: 527-534 [Online] Available at http://jac.oxfordjournals.org/content/48/4/527 (Accessed 15 September, 2016)

[3]. CASP, (2006) Guyatt G H, Sackett D L, and Cook D J, Users’ guides to the medical literature. II. How to use an article about therapy or prevention. Critical Appraisal Skills Programme, JAMA 1993; 270 (21): 2598-2601 and JAMA 1994; 271(1): 59-63 [Online] Available at http://www.sph.nhs.uk/sph-files/casp-appraisal-tools/rct%20appraisal%20tool.pdf

[4]. (Accessed 15 September, 2016)

[5]. Crowe, David, (2011) Liver Damage, Concerns about HAART (Highly Active Anti-Retroviral Therapy), Alberta Reappraising AIDS Society [Online] Available at http://aras.ab.ca/haart-liver.html (Accessed 15 September, 2016)

[6]. Edelstein H, Chirurgi V, Oster S, Karp R, Cassano K, Aiken S, McCabe R(1991) A randomized trial of cefepime (BMY-28142) and ceftazidime for the treatment of pneumonia. J Antimicrob Chemotherapy,28(4):569-75.[Online] Available at

[7].

http://www.druglib.com/abstract/ed/edelstein-h_j-antimicrob-chemother_19911000.html (Accessed 15 September, 2016)

[8]. FDA, (2009) Maxipime (cefepime hydrochloride), Statistical Review and Evaluation, [Online] Available at

[9].

http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/DrugSafety/PostmarketDrugSafetyInformationforPatientsandProviders/DrugSafetyInformationforHeathcareProfessionals/UCM167309.pdf (Accessed 26 September, 2016)

[10]. Guyatt GH, Sackett D.L, Cook D.J., (1993) Users’ guides to the medical literature. II.

[11]. How to use an article about therapy or prevention, A. Are the results of the study valid? JAMA 1993; (270): 2598-2601.,

[12]. [Online] Available at http://www.cche.net/text/usersguides/therapy.asp (Accessed 15 September, 2016)

[13]. Halpern, M., Brown, R., Drolet, M., Sorensen, S., Mandell, L., (1997) Decision analysis modelling of costs and outcomes following cefepime monotherapy in Canada, The Can J Infect Dis.1997 Jan-Feb; 8(1): 19–27.[Online} Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3327332/ (Accessed 16 September, 2016)

[14]. PEDro scale, (1999) Physiotherapy Evidence Data Base [Online] Available at http://www.pedro.org.au/english/downloads/pedro-scale/ (Accessed 15 September, 2016)

[15]. SIGN (2011) Methodology Checklist w: randomised controlled trials, Scottish intercollegiate guidelines Network, [Online] Available at http://www.sign.ac.uk/guidelines/fulltext/50/checklist2.html (Accessed 15 September, 2016)

[16]. Silagy, C., Mant D, Fowler G, Lodge M., (1994) Meta-analysis on efficacy of nicotine replacement therapies in smoking cessation, The Lancet, 343, 8890 p. 139 [Online] Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7904003 (Accessed 15 September, 2016)

[17]. SFAF, (2011) Syringe Access, San Francisco Aids Foundation, [Online] Available at http://www.sfaf.org/client-services/health-services/syringe-access/ (Accessed 15 September, 2016)

[18]. Mhaskar, R., Emmanuel, P., Mishra, S., Patel, S., Naik, E., and Kumar, A.,(2009) “Critical Appraisal Skills Are Essential to Informed Decision-Making.” Indian Journal of Sexually Transmitted Diseases 30.2 (2009): 112–119. PMC. [Online] Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3168054/ (Accessed 15 Sept. 2016).

[19]. Oxman AD, (1994) CASP, User’s Guide to Medical Literature VI, JAMA 272:1367-1371

[20]. [Online] Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7933399 (Accessed 15 September, 2016)

[21]. WHO (2004) Disease of poverty and the 10/90 Gap, World Health Organization [Online] Available at http://www.who.int/intellectualproperty/submissions/InternationalPolicyNetwork.pdf (Accessed 16 September, 2016)

Wu, P., (2006) Effectiveness of smoking cessation therapies: a systematic review and meta-analysis, Biomed Central Journal, 6:300 [Online] Available at http://www.biomed.com/1471-2458/6/300, (Accessed 15 September, 2016)