Principles, Assumptions, and Processes Established to Designate Biologics Assets as a Fast to FIH (First-in-Human) Program and the Associated Core Concepts for the Utilization of low and High-Risk Activities, Timelines and Functional Level Expectations
Abstract:
Biologics development represents a substantial advancement in
the pharmaceutical industry because of their promise and huge success in the oncology,
immunoscience, and cardiovascular disease areas. Prior to entering the marketed
product development phase, each biopharmaceutical needs to go through series of
stages that will allow or disallow the biologics asset to become a commercialized
product. Each of those phases includes development planning and designing of studies
to test relevant hypotheses to support the drug label if approved.
The current thesis will focus on the principles, assumptions,
and processes that are established to designate an asset (biologics) as a targeted
first-in-human program. First-in-human studies are included under phase 1 trials,
where initial human exposure is initiated to the investigational new drug (IND).
Phase 1 is critical since it affirms if a compound’s mechanisms of action in humans
and its development can result in a potentially new drug entity.
Subsequently, step by step initiatives and processes from the
perspective of different functional groups within the pharma will be revised to
outline the staged procedures, methods, critical, and non-critical paths taken when
a molecule is nominated as a clinical candidate. Overall alignment of deliverables
will be presented between the different functional areas that partake in the first-in-human
development.
Strategic changes to the biologics development process, cell line
development with multiple candidate sequences, initial platform fit assessment for
a process, analytical and formulation will be acknowledged. Platform strategy for
drug substance production, as well as, drug product composition will be outlined
along with boilerplates for analytical method development to fit or not fit the
platform approach. The functional groups that
will be reviewed will be; Discovery, Cell line development, Drug Substance process
development, Formulation development, Toxicology, Quality, Drug Substance manufacturing,
Drug Product manufacturing, Stability and regulatory.
Keywords: Fast to First in Human,
Biologics, Development, Clinical.
References:
[1]. Adler, E. S., & Clark,
R. (2014). An invitation to social research. Belmont, CA: Cengage Learning.
[2]. Andrew X. Zhu, P. J.-k.,
& Philip, P. A. (2013). First-in-Man Phase
I Study of GC33, A Novel Recombinant Humanized Antibody against Glypican-3, in Patients
with Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Clinical Cancer Research.
[3]. Atanasov, A. G., et al.
(2015). Discovery and resupply of pharmacologically
active plant-derived natural products: A review. Biotechnology Advances, 33(8),
1582–1614.
[4]. Bartlett, D. L. (2011).
Surgical Oncology: Fundamentals, evidence-based approaches and new technology.
New Delhi: Jaypee Brothers Pvt. Ltd.
[5]. Berger, A. A. (2011). Media
and communication research methods: An introduction to qualitative and quantitative
approaches. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.
[6]. Bumbaca, D., et al. (2011).
Highly specific off-target binding identified
and eliminated during the humanization of an antibody against FGF receptor 4.
MAbs Journal, 3(4), 376–386.
[7]. Conner, J., et al. (2014).
Biotechnology entrepreneurship. New York: Elsevier Inc.
[8]. Creswell, J. W. (2014).
Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches.
Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
[9]. Dostalek, M., Prueksaritanont,
T., & Kelley, R. (2017). Pharmacokinetic
de-risking tools for selection of monoclonal antibody lead candidates. MAbs Journal, 9(5), 756-766.
[10]. Ehnert, I. (2009). Sustainable human resource management: A
conceptual and exploratory analysis from a paradox perspective. Heidelberg:
Physica-Verlag Press.
[11]. Eisenhauer, E. A., Twelves, C., & Buyse, M. E. (2015). Phase
I Cancer Clinical Trials : A Practical Guide. New York: Oxford University Press.
[12]. European Medicines Agency. (1988). Pharmacokinetic Studies
in Man. Retrieved 09 15, 2017, from European Medicines Agency: Retrieved from
http://www.ema.europa.eu/ema/index.jsp?curl=pages/regulation/general/general_content_001289.jsp&mid=WC0b01ac0580032ec5
[13]. FDA. (2017a). Step 2: Preclinical research. Retrieved from
https://www.fda.gov/forpatients/approvals/drugs/ucm405658.htm
[14]. FDA. (2017b). Step 3: Clinical research. Retrieved from
https://www.fda.gov/forpatients/approvals/drugs/ucm405622.htm
[15]. FDA. (2017c). Inside clinical trials: Testing medical products
in people. Retrieved from https://www.fda.gov/drugs/resourcesforyou/consumers/ucm143531.htm
[16]. Feldman, E. J., Lancet, J. E., Kolitz, J. E., Ritchie, E. K.,
Roboz, G. J., & List, A. F. (2011). First-In-Man
Study of CPX-351. Journaal of Clinical
Oncology , 979-985.
[17]. Food and Drug Agency. (2005). Guidance for Industry:Clinical
Studies. New York: Rockville,.
[18]. Forum on Neuroscience and Nervous System Disorders,Board on Health
Sciences Policy, & Institute of Medicine. (2014). Improving and accelerating
therapeutic development for nervous system disorders: Workshop summary. Washington
DC: National Academies Press.
[19]. Gad, S. C. (2011). Safety evaluation of Pharmaceuticals and
Medical Devices : International Rregulatory Guidelines. New York: Springer.
[20]. Giese, G. (2017). Clinical pharmacology 1: Phase 1 studies
and early drug. Retrieved from https://www.fda.gov/downloads/training/clinicalinvestigatortrainingcourse/ucm340007.pdf
[21]. Hanauer, S. B. (2008). The
ethics of phase I trials of biologic agents. Nature Clinical Practice Gastroenterology & Hepatology, 5(10), 533.
[22]. History of Vaccines. (2017). Vaccine development, testing,
and regulation. Retrieved from https://www.historyofvaccines.org/content/articles/vaccine-development-testing-and-regulation
[23]. Hojjat-Farsangi, M. (2014). Small-Molecule Inhibitors of the Receptor Tyrosine Kinases: Promising tools
for targeted cancer therapies. International
Journal of Molecular Sciences, 15(8),
13768–13801.
[24]. Institute of Medicine (US) Committee. (2010). Accelerating Rare Diseases Research and Orphan
Product Development. In M. J. Field, & T. Boat, Rare Diseases and Orphan Products: Accelerating Research and Development
(p. Chapter 5: Development of New Therapeutic Drugs and Biologics for Rare Diseases).
Washington DC: National Academies Press. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK56179/.
[25]. Klein, J., & Blaser, G. (2016, Novemeber). Expression of
next generation biologics requires next generation expression systems. Retrieved
from http://bio.lonza.com/uploads/tx_mwaxmarketingmaterial/Lonza_Webinars_Next_Generation_Expression_Systems.pdf
[26]. Kudrin, A. (2012). Overview
of cancer vaccines. Human Vaccines
Immunother, 8(9), 1335–1353.
doi:10.4161/hv.20518.
[27]. Li, F., et al. (2010). Cell
culture processes for monoclonal antibody production. MAbs Journals, 2(5), 466–477.
[28]. Li, Y., et al. (2016). Quantitation
and pharmacokinetic modeling of therapeutic antibody quality attributes in human
studies. MAbs Journal, 8(6), 1079–1087.
[29]. Lybecker, K. M. (2016, January). The biologics revolution in
the production of drugs. Retrieved from https://www.fraserinstitute.org/sites/default/files/biologics-revolution-in-the-production-of-drugs.pdf
[30]. Macnee, C. L., & McCabe, S. (2008). Understanding nursing
research: Using research in evidence-based practice. Philadelphia, PA: Wolters
Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
[31]. Marion, D. (2013). An Introduction
to Biological NMR Spectroscopy. Mol
Cell Proteomics , 12(11), 3006–3025.
[32]. Medina, C. (2003). Compliance handbook for pharmaceuticals,
medical devices, and biologics. London: CRC Press.
[33]. Mócsai, A., Kovács, L., & Gergely, P. (2014). What is the
future of targeted therapy in rheumatology: biologics or small molecules? BMC
Medicine, 12(43), 1-9.
[34]. Phrma. (2017). Biopharmaceutical research & development:
The process behind new medicines. Retrieved from http://phrma-docs.phrma.org/sites/default/files/pdf/rd_brochure_022307.pdf.
[35]. Prueksaritanont, T., & Tang, C. (2012). ADME of biologics—What have we learned from small
molecules? The AAPS Journal
, 14(3), 410-419.
[36]. Rahman, M. S. (2016). The
advantages and disadvantages of using qualitative and quantitative Approaches and
methods in language “testing and assessment” research: A literature review.
Journal of Education and Learning,
6(1), 102-112.
[37]. Roberts, A. (2015). Maintaining
the stability of biologics. BioPharm
International Journal, 28(3),
38-41.
[38]. Rosenberg, A., & Demeule, B. (2015). Biobetters: Protein
engineering to approach the curative. New York: Springer Publications.
[39]. Rubin, A., & Babbie, E. R. (2010). Essential research methods
for social work. Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole, Cengage Learning Press.
[40]. Suh, H. Y., Peck, C. C., Yu, K.-S., & Lee, H. (2016). Determination of the starting dose in the first-in-human
clinical trials with monoclonal antibodies: a systematic review of papers published
between 1990 and 2013. Drug Design,
Development and Therapy.
[41]. The Conversation. (2015, August 5). Explainer: what are biologics
and biosimilars? Retrieved from https://theconversation.com/explainer-what-are-biologics-and-biosimilars-45308.
[42]. Tibbitts, J., et al. (2016). Key factors influencing ADME properties of therapeutic proteins: A need
for ADME characterization in drug discovery and development. MAbs Journal, 8(2), 229–245.
[43]. Tolley, E. E., Ulin, P. R., & Robinson, E. T. (2013). Qualitative
methods in public health: A field guide for applied research. San Francisco,
CA: Jossey-Bass Press.
[44]. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, et al. (2015, July).
Analytical procedures and methods validation for drugs and biologics: Guidance
for industry. Retrieved from https://www.fda.gov/downloads/drugs/guidances/ucm386366.pdf
[45]. Vugmeyster, Y., et al. (2011). Complex pharmacokinetics of a humanized antibody against human amyloid beta
peptide, anti-abeta Ab2, in nonclinical species. Pharmaceutical Research, 28(17),
1696–1706.
[46]. Waltz, E. (2014). It's official:
Biologics are pharma's darlings. Nature
Biotechnology, 32(2), 117.
[47]. Wang, W., & Prueksaritanont, T. (2010). Prediction of human clearance of therapeutic
proteins: Simple allometric scaling method revisited. Biopharmaceutics & Drug Disposition Journal
, 31, 253–263.
[48]. Wang, W., & Singh, M. (2014). Biological drug products:
Development and strategies. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
[49]. Wang, W., et al. (2011). Monoclonal
antibodies with identical Fc sequences can bind to FcRn differentially with pharmacokinetic
consequences. Drug Metabolism and Disposition
Journal, 39, 1469–1477.
[50]. Wiley, F. (2016, July). What are biologics? Retrieved from
https://medshadow.org/features/what-are-biologics/.
[51]. Wong, G. (2009). Biotech
scientists bank on big pharma's biologics push. Retrieved from https://www.nature.com/nbt/journal/v27/n3/full/nbt0309-293.html
[52]. Zhao, L., Ren, T.-h., & Wang, D. D. (2012). Clinical Pharmacology Considerations in Biologics
Development. Acta Pharmacologica Sinica,
1339–1347.
[53]. Zimney, E. (2008). Understanding biologics: How they differ
from Drugs and why they cost more. Retrieved 09 15, 2017, from Every Day health:
http://www.everydayhealth.com/columns/zimney-health-and-medical-news-you-can-use/understanding-biologics-how-they-differ-from-drugs-and-why-they-cost-more/