A Model to Assess Technological Innovations at Institutions of Higher Learning in Kenya

Download Article

DOI: 10.21522/TIJAR.2014.04.02.Art022

Authors : Rajab Philip Muchiri

Abstract:

Objective: The aim was to develop an innovation assessment model to analyse the impact of broadband in spurring innovations in Kenya by studying the role of broadband diffusion, the impact of broadband collaborations, the influence of electronic research and the role of online broadband products usability.

Background: Many countries in Africa invest in broadband infrastructure because they have realized that broadband encourages innovation leading to economic development and prosperity. Understanding the relationship between universities, business enterprises and government enabled by broadband is critical in assessing a country's innovative capacity.

Methodology: This study applied descriptive survey research design. It used a logistic regression model as an inferential analysis tool in the quantitative aspects of the research. The target population for this study was institutions of higher learning (IHL) operating in Kenya by 31st December, 2015 which included both private and public accredited universities in Kenya.

Results: The response rate from the sampled population was at 75% Reliability measures were above the recommended level of 0.70 as an indicator for adequate internal consistency. The overall model evaluation, goodness-of-fit statistics, statistical tests of individual predictors and validations of predicted probabilities. Showed that the data fitted the model and the model performed well.

Conclusion: Institutions of higher learning in Kenya have a positive but low capacity in technological innovation implementation. Broadband diffusion is inhibited by poor infrastructural development attributed to high costs of connections and bandwidth acquisition and a high demand for broadband among the students and staff.

Keywords: Broadband, Innovation, Internet, Education, model.

References:

[1].     Anderson, J.C., Gerbing, D.W., (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: a review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin 103, 423–441.

[2].     Bertrand, W. E. (2010). Higher education and technology transfer: The effects of “Technosclerosis” on development. Journal of International Affairs, 64(1), 101–120.

[3].     Dodds, T. (2007). Information technology, a contribution to innovation in higher education. Available online: http://www.mendeley.com/research/informationtechnology-contributor-innovation-higher-education.

[4].     Dong, L., Neufeld, D., & Higgins, C. (2008).Testing Klein and Sorra’s innovation implementation model: An empirical examination. Journal of Engineering and Technology, 25, 237–255.

[5].     Etzkowitz, H., Leydesdorff, L. 1998.The endless transition: A "triple helix" of universityindustry-government relations. Minerva 36, 203-208.

[6].     Etzkowitz, H. 2003. Innovation in Innovation: The Triple Helix of University-Industry- Government Relations. Social Science Information 42, 293-338.

[7].     Etzkowitz, H. 2008. The Triple Helix: University-Industry-Government Innovation in Action. Routledge, London.

[8].     Etzkowitz, H. 2012. Triple Helix Clusters: Boundary Permeability at University-Industry Government Interfaces as a Regional Innovation Strategy. Environment & Planning C: Government and Policy. In Press

[9].     Etzkowitz, H., Leydesdorff, L. 2000. The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and "Mode 2" to a Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations. Research Policy 29, 109-123.

[10].  Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny H., Schwartzmann, S., Scott, P. and Trow, M. 1994. The New Production of Knowledge, Sage.

[11].  Godin and Gingras, 2000. The place of universities in the system of knowledge production. Research Policy 29, 273-278.

[12].  Hair, J.F., Anderson, R.E., Tatham, R.L., Black, W.C., (1995). Multivariate Data Analysis with Readings. Prentice-Hall International, Englewood Cliffs.

[13].  http://ehlt.flinders.edu.au/ education/iej/articles/v6n4/jhurree/paper.pdf.

[14].  http://ssrn.com/abstract=2168595orhttp://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2168595, http://www.ascilite2012.org/images/custom/mirriahi,_negin_-_identifying_key.pdf.

[15].  Jaffer, S., Ng’ambi, D., & Czerniewicz, L. (2007). The role of ICTs in higher education in South Africa: One strategy for addressing teaching and learning challenges. International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology (IJEDICT), 3(4), 131–142.

[16].  Jhurree, V. (2005). Technology integration in education in developing countries: Guidelines to policy makers 1. International Education Journal, 6(4), 467–483.

[17].  Leydesdorff, L. 2009. Configurational Information as Potentially Negative Entropy: The Triple Helix Model. Entropy 10, 391-410.

[18].  Lohmoller, J.B., (1989). Latent Variable Path Modeling with Partial Least Square Analysis. Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg.

[19].  Luhmann, N., 1984. Soziale Systeme. Grundriß einer allgemeinen Theorie. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt a. M. Social Systems. Stanford Univ. Press, Stanford, 1995.

[20].  McGregor, J. H. (2002). Flexible scheduling: How does a principal facilitate implementation? School Libraries Worldwide, 8(1), 71–84, available online on http://www.ala.org/aasl/aaslpubsandjournals/slmrb/slmrcontents/volume9/flexible#findings.

[21].  Mirriahi, N., Dawson, S., & Hoven, D. (2012). Identifying key actors for technology adoption in higher education: A social network approach. Acsilite 2012 future challenges,     sustainable futures. Retrieved from:

[22].  Oliver, R. (2002). The role of ICT in higher education for the 21st century: ICT as a change agent for education. Proceedings of the Higher Education for the 21st Century Conference. Miri, Sarawak: Curtin University.

[23].  Peng, C.-Y. J., Lee, K. L., & Ingersoll, G. M. (2002). An introduction to logistic regression analysis and reporting. The Journal of Educational Research, 96(1), 3– 14.doi:10.1080/00220670209598786.

[24].  Sawang, S. & Unsworth, K. (2011). A model of organizational innovation implementation effectiveness in small to medium firms. International Journal of Innovation Management, 15 (5), 1–22. Available online.

[25].  Schumpeter, J.A. 1942. Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. George Allen & Unwin, New York.

[26].  Shannon, C. E. 1948. A mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Technical Journal 27, 379–423 and 623–656, July and October 1948.

[27].  Slaughter, S., L. Leslie. 1997. Academic Capitalism: Politics, Policies and the Entrepreneurial Universities. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.