A Model to Assess Technological Innovations at Institutions of Higher Learning in Kenya
Abstract:
Objective: The aim was to develop
an innovation assessment model to analyse the impact of broadband in spurring innovations
in Kenya by studying the role of broadband diffusion, the impact of broadband collaborations,
the influence of electronic research and the role of online broadband products usability.
Background: Many countries in Africa
invest in broadband infrastructure because they have realized that broadband encourages
innovation leading to economic development and prosperity. Understanding the relationship
between universities, business enterprises and government enabled by broadband is
critical in assessing a country's innovative capacity.
Methodology: This study applied descriptive
survey research design. It used a logistic regression model as an inferential analysis
tool in the quantitative aspects of the research.
The target population for this study was institutions of higher learning
(IHL) operating in Kenya by 31st December, 2015 which included both private and
public accredited universities in Kenya.
Results: The response
rate from the sampled population was at 75% Reliability measures were above the
recommended level of 0.70 as an indicator for adequate internal consistency. The
overall model evaluation, goodness-of-fit statistics, statistical tests of individual
predictors and validations of predicted probabilities. Showed that the data fitted
the model and the model performed well.
Conclusion: Institutions of higher
learning in Kenya have a positive but low capacity in technological innovation implementation.
Broadband diffusion is inhibited by poor infrastructural development attributed
to high costs of connections and bandwidth acquisition and a high demand for broadband
among the students and staff.
Keywords: Broadband,
Innovation, Internet, Education, model.
References:
[1].
Anderson, J.C., Gerbing, D.W., (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice:
a review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin 103, 423–441.
[2].
Bertrand, W. E. (2010). Higher education
and technology transfer: The effects of “Technosclerosis” on development. Journal
of International Affairs, 64(1), 101–120.
[3].
Dodds, T. (2007). Information technology,
a contribution to innovation in higher education. Available online: http://www.mendeley.com/research/informationtechnology-contributor-innovation-higher-education.
[4].
Dong, L., Neufeld, D., & Higgins, C.
(2008).Testing Klein and Sorra’s innovation implementation model: An empirical examination.
Journal of Engineering and Technology, 25, 237–255.
[5].
Etzkowitz, H., Leydesdorff, L. 1998.The endless
transition: A "triple helix" of universityindustry-government relations.
Minerva 36, 203-208.
[6].
Etzkowitz, H. 2003. Innovation in Innovation:
The Triple Helix of University-Industry- Government Relations. Social Science Information
42, 293-338.
[7].
Etzkowitz, H. 2008. The Triple Helix: University-Industry-Government
Innovation in Action. Routledge, London.
[8].
Etzkowitz, H. 2012. Triple Helix Clusters:
Boundary Permeability at University-Industry Government Interfaces as a Regional
Innovation Strategy. Environment & Planning C: Government and Policy. In Press
[9].
Etzkowitz, H., Leydesdorff, L. 2000. The
dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and "Mode 2" to a Triple
Helix of university-industry-government relations. Research Policy 29, 109-123.
[10]. Gibbons,
M., Limoges, C., Nowotny H., Schwartzmann, S., Scott, P. and Trow, M. 1994. The
New Production of Knowledge, Sage.
[11]. Godin
and Gingras, 2000. The place of universities in the system of knowledge production.
Research Policy 29, 273-278.
[12]. Hair,
J.F., Anderson, R.E., Tatham, R.L., Black, W.C., (1995). Multivariate Data Analysis with Readings. Prentice-Hall International,
Englewood Cliffs.
[13]. http://ehlt.flinders.edu.au/
education/iej/articles/v6n4/jhurree/paper.pdf.
[14]. http://ssrn.com/abstract=2168595orhttp://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2168595,
http://www.ascilite2012.org/images/custom/mirriahi,_negin_-_identifying_key.pdf.
[15]. Jaffer,
S., Ng’ambi, D., & Czerniewicz, L. (2007). The role of ICTs in higher education
in South Africa: One strategy for addressing teaching and learning challenges. International
Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology
(IJEDICT), 3(4), 131–142.
[16]. Jhurree,
V. (2005). Technology integration in education in developing countries: Guidelines
to policy makers 1. International Education Journal, 6(4), 467–483.
[17]. Leydesdorff,
L. 2009. Configurational Information as Potentially Negative Entropy: The Triple
Helix Model. Entropy 10, 391-410.
[18]. Lohmoller,
J.B., (1989). Latent Variable Path Modeling
with Partial Least Square Analysis. Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg.
[19]. Luhmann,
N., 1984. Soziale Systeme. Grundriß einer allgemeinen Theorie. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt
a. M. Social Systems. Stanford Univ. Press, Stanford, 1995.
[20]. McGregor,
J. H. (2002). Flexible scheduling: How does a principal facilitate implementation?
School Libraries Worldwide, 8(1), 71–84, available online on http://www.ala.org/aasl/aaslpubsandjournals/slmrb/slmrcontents/volume9/flexible#findings.
[21]. Mirriahi,
N., Dawson, S., & Hoven, D. (2012). Identifying key actors for technology adoption
in higher education: A social network approach. Acsilite 2012 future challenges,
sustainable futures. Retrieved from:
[22]. Oliver,
R. (2002). The role of ICT in higher education for the 21st century: ICT as a change
agent for education. Proceedings of the Higher Education for the 21st Century Conference.
Miri, Sarawak: Curtin University.
[23]. Peng,
C.-Y. J., Lee, K. L., & Ingersoll, G. M. (2002). An introduction to logistic
regression analysis and reporting. The Journal of Educational Research, 96(1), 3–
14.doi:10.1080/00220670209598786.
[24]. Sawang,
S. & Unsworth, K. (2011). A model of organizational innovation implementation
effectiveness in small to medium firms. International Journal of Innovation Management,
15 (5), 1–22. Available online.
[25]. Schumpeter,
J.A. 1942. Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. George Allen & Unwin, New York.
[26]. Shannon,
C. E. 1948. A mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Technical
Journal 27, 379–423 and 623–656, July and October 1948.
[27]. Slaughter,
S., L. Leslie. 1997. Academic Capitalism: Politics, Policies and the Entrepreneurial
Universities. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.