The Essence of Monitoring and Evaluation Systems for Good Governance of Catholic Institutions in Zambia

Download Article

DOI: 10.21522/TIJAR.2014.11.01.Art010

Authors : Jonas Phiri

Abstract:

Monitoring and evaluation (M&E) are a process that involves collecting and analysing data to measure progress toward achieving specific goals and objectives. This process helps organisations to identify what is working and what is not and to make informed decisions on how to improve their programs and projects. This paper focuses on the necessity of M&E in Catholic institutions in Zambia, Lusaka in particular. It underscores the fact that there is no good governance in these institutions due to inadequate M&E mechanisms. The only means of M&E are meetings. The research was done in Lusaka District and some parts of Central Province. It was conducted in 7 institutions. The sample size was 257. There were 252 questionnaires which were administered purposively and randomly to those in the first line, middle and top leadership, and management positions, and 5 in-depth interviews were carried out purposively. It identifies the causes of poor governance as inadequate results-based M&E systems, deficient focus on Key Result Areas (KRAs) and Key Performance Indicators (KPIs), and irregular monitoring of institutional activities. The recommendations were that there was need to build capacity in the areas of performance management, stewardship approach to management (good governance), and to enhance M&E systems. Theoretically, the results can be generalised to all Catholic institutions in Zambia.

Keywords: Catholic Institutions, Good Governance, Key Performance Indicators, Key Result Areas Monitoring and Evaluation, Stewardship.

References:

[1] Zech, E. C. (Ed). (2010). Best Practices in Catholic Church Ministry Performance Management. New York: Lexington Books.

[2] Buford, B. (2014). Drucker & Me: What a Texas Entrepreneur Learned from the Father of Modern Management. Tennessee: Worthy Publishing.

[3] Independent Evaluation Group of the World Bank (2013 – 2023). Monitoring and Evaluation, https://www.ieg.com/

[4] Suchal, B. (2023). Effective Methods of Performance Appraisal, https://www.google.com/search?q=suchal+bojamma+2023.

[5] Cole, A. G. (2004). Management Theory and Practice (6th Edition). London: Book Power.

[6] Zambia Conference of Catholic Bishops. (2022). ZCCB Pre-Synod Synthesis on the Synod on Synodality. Lusaka: Catholic Secretariat. See also Pope John Paul II. (1995). The Church in Africa: Post-Synodal Apostolic Exhortation. Nairobi: Paulines.

[7] Archdiocese of Lusaka Pastoral Office. (2012). Archdiocese of Lusaka Pastoral Plan: 2012 - 2016. Lusaka: Artperfect.

[8] Pope Francis (2022). Preach the Gospel: Apostolic Constitution Praedicate Evangelium. Nairobi: Paulines.

[9] Zambia Conference of Catholic Bishops. (2016). ZCCB Strategic Plan: 2017-2026. Lusaka: Catholic Secretariat.

[10] Chilenje Parish Team. (2019). Strategic Plan for St. Joseph’s Parish: 2019-2023. Lusaka: Artperfect.

[11] Lusaka Archdiocese Pastoral Office. (2023). Lusaka Archdiocese Strategic Plan 2023 -2027. Lusaka: Sotrane Publishers.

[12] Feilzer, M. Y. (2010). Doing mixed methods research pragmatically: Implications for the rediscovery of pragmatism as a research paradigm. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 4(1), 6–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689809349691.


[13] Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Method Approaches. London: Sage.

[14] Cole, A. G. (2004). Management Theory and Practice (6th Edition). London: Book Power.

[15] Ibrahim O. (2002, October). Monitoring and Evaluation Division, https://www.google.com/search?q=brahim+Osman.+Monitoring+and+Evaluation+Division.+October+2002.

Suchal, B. (2023). Effective Methods of Performance Appraisal, https://www.google.com/search?q=suchal+bojamma+2023.