Does Gender Matter in the Adoption of Emails in the Namibian Enterprises?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7deb7/7deb764be25d3ed7739c4110f8f9d3096c5df247" alt=""
Abstract:
The paper examines if gender matters in the
use of emails in the enterprises of Namibia. The paper is based on the usefulness
of emails in business organizations, using the Namibia Enterprise Survey data collected
from 580 enterprises by the World Bank in 2014/2015 in order to test a null hypothesis
that there is no association in the use of emails between women and men top-managed
enterprises in Namibia. The paper finds out that there is an association with men
in top-managed enterprises using more emails than women’s top-managed organizations.
This finding signifies the institutionalized gender digital divide in enterprises,
signalling the marginal benefit of advantages accruing from emails in the enterprises
that are top managed by women. Hence, gender matters.
References:
[1] United Nations.
(2014). Empowering women entrepreneurs through information and communications technologies:
a practical guide. U.N. Conference on Trade and Development, UNCTAD Current Studies
on Science, Technology, and Innovation. 9. http://unctad.org/en/pages/PublicationWebflyer.aspx?publicationid=875.
[2] Lagesen, V.A.
(2012). Reassembling gender: actor-network theory (ANT) and the making of the technology
in gender. Social Studies of Science. 42 (30). 442–448.
[3] Martin, L. & Wright, L.T. (2005). No gender in cyberspace? Empowering entrepreneurship and innovation in female-run ICT small firms. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research. 11 (2). 162–178.
[4] Everett, A. (2014). On cyberfeminism and cyber womanism: high-tech mediations of feminism’s discontents. Signs. 30 (1). 1278–1286.
[5] Rommes, E., Bath, C. & Maass, S. (2012). Methods for intervention: gender analysis and feminist design of ICT. Science, Technology, & Human Values. 37 (6). 653–662.
[6] Venkatesh, V., & Morris, M. G. (2000).
Why don’t men ever stop to ask for directions? Gender, social influence, and their
role in technology acceptance and usage behaviour. MIS Quarterly. 24. 115–139. https://doi.org/10.2307/3250981.
[7] Debrand, C.C., & Johnson, J. J. (2008).
Gender differences in email and instant messaging: A study of undergraduate business
information systems students. Journal of Computer Information Systems. 48
(3), 20–30.
[8] Goswami,
A. & Dutta, S. (2016). Gender Differences in Technology Usage—A Literature Review.
Open Journal of Business and Management. 4. 51-59. https://www.scirp.org/pdf/OJBM_2016011410094953.pdf.
[9] Teo, T., Fan, X., & Du. J. (2015).
Technology acceptance among pre-service teachers: Does gender matter? Australasian
Journal of Educational Technology. 31 (3), 235-251.
[10] Talukder, M., Quazi, A.,
& Djatikusumol, D. (2020). Social media and SMEs: A study of drivers of adoption
of innovation in an organizational setting. Disruptive Technology: Concepts, Methodologies,
Tools, and Applications. IGI Global. 878-908.
[11]
Gupta, A., Sharda, R., Ducheneaut, N., Zhao,
J.L., & Weber, R. (2006). Email Management: A Techno-Managerial Research Perspective.
Communications of the Association for Information Systems. 17. 941-961.
[12] Cerqueira, R.F., da Silva, S.P.R., & Marreiros, C.G. (2013). Email usage practices in an organizational context: a study with Portuguese workers. Journal of Information Systems and Technology Management. 10 (1), 05-20. DOI: 10.4301/S1807-17752013000100001.
[13] Demiroglu, N.B. (2020). Email as a tool for effective management of the small business. International Conference on Economic and Social Trends for Sustainability of Modern Society. DOI: 10.15405/epsbs.2020.10.03.18.
[14] Chui, M., Manyika, J., Bughin, J., Dobbs, R., Roxburgh, C., Sarrazin, H., Sands, G., & Westergren, M. (2012). The social economy: Unlocking value and productivity through social technologies. A report by McKinsey Global Institute.
[15] Obradović, M., Alčaković, S., & Pavlović, O. (2018). Effective Use of Email Marketing on Example of Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises in Serbia, International scientific conference on information technology and data-related research. SINTEZA. DOI: 10.15308/Sinteza-2018-79-84.
[16] Herring,
S. (1994). Gender Differences in Computer-Mediated Communication: Bringing Familiar
Baggage to the New Frontier, Miami, USA: American Library Association annual convention
- keynote talk, June 27, 1994.
[17]
Caracuel, M. D. S. (2010). A Gender Analysis
of Email Communication. Inter lingüística. (21). 231-239.
[18]
Valenziano, L. (2007). Effects of Gender on
Computer-Mediated Communication: A Survey of University Faculty. Online Submission,
Paper presented at the International Research Conference in the Americas
of the Academy of Human Resource Development. Indianapolis, IN, Feb 28-Mar 4, 2007.
[19] Boneva, B., Kraut, R., & Frohlich, D. (2001). Using email for personal relationships: The difference gender makes. American Behavioral Psychologist. 45(3), 530-549.
[20] Al-Moqbali, A. M., & Al-Amrani, S. N. (2021). Gender Differences in Email Communication Among University English Teachers in Oman. Available at SSRN 3807088.
[21] Kuschel,
K. & Lepeley, M-T. (2016). Women start-ups in technology: literature review
and research agenda to improve participation. International Journal of Entrepreneurship
and Small Business. 27 (2/3), pp. 333-346.
[22]
United Nations. (2014). Empowering women entrepreneurs through information
and communications technologies: a practical guide. U.N. Conference on Trade and
Development, UNCTAD Current Studies on Science, Technology, and Innovation. Vol.
9 [online] http://unctad.org/en/pages/PublicationWebflyer.aspx?publicationid=875.
[23] Lagesen, V.A. (2012). Reassembling gender: actor-network theory (ANT) and the making of the technology in gender. Social Studies of Science. 42 (3). 442–448.
[24] Martin, L. & Wright, L.T. (2005). No gender in cyberspace? Empowering entrepreneurship and innovation in female-run ICT small firms. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research. 11 (2). 162–178.
[25] Everett, A. (2014). On cyberfeminism and cyber womanism: high-tech mediations of feminism’s discontents. Signs. 30 (1). 1278–1286.
[26] Rommes, E., Bath, C. & Maass, S. (2012). Methods for intervention: gender analysis and feminist design of ICT. Science, Technology, & Human Values. 37 (6). 653–662.
[27] Mukata, C.M. & Swanepoel, E. (2017). Development support for small and medium enterprises in the financially constrained north-eastern regions of Namibia. Southern African Business Review. 21. 198-221.
[28] Dataset downloaded from: https://login.enterprisesurveys.org/content/sites/financeandprivatesector/en/library/library-detail.html/content/dam/wbgassetshare/enterprisesurveys/economy/namibia/Namibia-2014-full-data.dta [29th July 2021].
[29] Kim, H-Y. (2017). Statistical notes for clinical researchers: Chi-squared test and Fisher’s exact test. Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics. 42 (2). 152-155. DOI: 10.5395/rde.2017.42.2.152.
[30] Boneva, B., Kraut, R., & Frohlich, D. (2001). Using email for personal relationships: The difference gender makes. American Behavioral Psychologist. 45 (3), 530-549.
[31] Bobek, V., Moritz, J. & Horvat, J. (2019). Namibia’s Triple Challenge and Its Economic Development, Perspectives on Economic Development - Public Policy, Culture, and Economic Development, Ryan Merlin Yonk and Vito Bobek, IntechOpen, DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.88638. Available from: https://www.intechopen.com/chapters/68719.
[32] Ferrant G. (2015). How Do Gender Inequalities Hinder Development? Cross-Country Evidence. Annals of Economics and Statistics, No. 117/118, Special Issue on the Economics of Gender. 313-352.
[33] Mukata, C.M & Caracuel, M. D. S. (2010). A Gender Analysis of Email Communication. Interlingüística, (21), 231-239.