Abstract:

The main focus of this research is to find out the effects of motivation on workers performance in Panas Pharmaceutical Pvt. Ltd. An effort have been made to evaluate the existing workers motivational policies in Panas Pharmaceutical with a view to examine the effects of motivation on worker productivity increase and also to identity the variable that are directly or indirectly responsible for workers performance, while assess how motivation come into play in Panas Pharmaceutical Pvt. Ltd. The researchers however, observed that most of the motivation Policies in the company were not adequately function and the little policies that are function were inconsistent and irrelevant for workers needs and desired in Panas Pharmaceutical. In making these findings possible, thirty (30) respondents were presented with questionnaires, out of sixty

(60) work force of the company and translated their responses into tables using simple distribution and percentages. Therefore, it has been proved that motivating workers sufficiently with relevance incentives as the only alternative towards workers performance to achieve goal and objectives of the organization. On the basis of these findings, implications of the findings for future study were highlighted.

KEYWORDS

Effects, Motivation, Workers, Performance 

References:

[1.] Afanjo,S.A (2002) “Individual choice and situation factors; influence on jobs satisfaction and commitment “ in sociology of work and occupations. Sage publications Pvt. Ltd London.

[2.] Akerele, A. (1991) “Role of labour in productivity” Nigeria Journal of Industrial Relation, P.5: 50-58.

[3.] Bergum, B and J.Lehr (1964) “Monetary Incentives and vigilance.” Journal Experimental psychology. No 7:197-198.

[4.] Eze, N. (1985), “Sources of motivation among Nigeria Managers” Journal of Social Psychology, 125:341-345

[5.] Feldman and Arnold, (1983) “Management individual and group behaviour in organization”. McGraw Hill Inc. New York USA

[6.] Kondalkar V. G. (2009), “Organisation development”, New Age International (P) Limited, Publishers, New Delhi.

[7.] Marsden D. and Richardson R., (1992) , “Motivation and performance related pay in the public sector: a case study of the inland revenue”, Centre for Economic Performance, London School of Economics, Discussion Paper No.75, May 1992.

[8.] Michael Armstrong (2009).“Armstrong‟s Handbook of Human Resource Management Practice”, Kogan Page Limited, USA.

[9.] Pravin M.M. and Nurul Kabir M.M., (2011) , “Factors Affecting Employee Job Satisfaction Of Pharmaceutical Sector” , Australian Journal of Business and Management Research Vol.1 No.9 [ Pg. 113-123] | December-2011