A Review of the Materiality of Classical and Modern Approaches to Public Administration in Africa
Abstract:
Public Administration’s long
history as a concept is as old as the very notion of government itself. Its foundations
as a discipline can be traced back to the 20th century writings of Max
Weber, Woodrow Wilson and Frederick Taylor. Their ideas found overt expression in
the administrations of European and American societies which had organised forms
of governments. Most pre-colonial African societies were organised according to
traditional structures governed by chiefs, councils of elders and kings. However,
with the political decolonisation of most African states, post World-War II, the United Nations advised
that there should be public administration and public service which should, in every
real sense, belong to the society they serve. Public bureaucracies came to be viewed
as the vehicles through which the struggle toward development and nation building
could be achieved. This paper seeks to give an overview of how the classical approaches
have been applied in post-colonial African states. It will also review how the new
public management approaches were (un)successfully implemented in these very states.
Using qualitative research and descriptive and exploratory methods, this paper will
explore the nexus between African bureaucracy and public administration approaches.
References:
[1]. Basheka,
B. C., 2015, Indigenous Africa’s Governance Architecture: A Need for African Public
Administration Theory? Journal of Public Administration, Volume 50, Number 3. https://www.academia.edu/38751190/
[2]. Dia, M.,
1996, Africa’s Management in the 1990s and Beyond Reconciling Indigenous and Transplanted
Institutions. Washington DC: World Bank, 1996, P25-37.
https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-162X(199705)17:2<290:
AID-PAD926>3.0.CO;2-R
[3]. Fry, Brian
R., 1989. Mastering Public Administration: From Max Weber to Dwight Waldo, Chatham
House Publishers, Inc., Chatham, New Jersey, P230-29. ISBN-10: 093454056X.
[4]. Hoos, J.,
G. Jenei and L. Vass. (2003). Public Administration and Public Management: Approaches
and Reforms, In: Public Policy in Central and Eastern Europe: Theories, Methods,
Practices, (eds.) M. Potucek, L.T. Leloup, G. Jenei, L. Varadi, NISPAcee, P 330-430.
[5]. Hughes,
Owen E. (2003). Public Management and Administration: An Introduction, 3rd ed.,
Palgrave Macmillan, P101-147.
[6]. Itika, J.
(2011). Theories and Stories in African, Public Administration, African Public Administration
and Management series, vol. 1, African Studies Centre / University of Groningen
/ Mzumbe University,
https://openaccess.leidenuniv.nl/bitstream/handle/1887/17784/ASC-075287668-2978-1.pdf?sequence=1
[7]. Katsamunska,
P. (2012). "Classical and Modern Approaches to Public Administration,"
Economic Alternatives, University of National and World Economy, Sofia, Bulgaria,
issue 1, pages 74-81.
[8]. Mutenheri,
F. Rational or Disjointed: Grappling
[9]. Economic
Policy Planning and Development in Zimbabwe, Journal of Sustainable Development
in Africa (Volume 10, No.4, 2009, Clarion University of Pennsylvania, Clarion, Pennsylvania,
ISSN: 1520-5509.
[10].
Olaniyan, R. O., 2008, International Meeting
Process for Debate and Proposals on Governance, The Southern African Perspectives
- Polokwane (South Africa),
http://www.institut-ouvernance.org/en/ouvrage/fiche-ouvrage-26.html
[11]. Olaopa.
T., 2009, Public Administration and Civil Service Reforms in Nigeria. Ibadan: University
Press PLC.
[12].
Sharma, S., Bajracharya, R. & Sitaula,
l., 2009, Indigenous knowledge and technology in Nepal. A review. Indian Journal
of traditional knowledge, 567-576.