Blended Learning Opportunities and Challenges in Mathematics Education: Perspective in Higher Education
Abstract:
Blended
learning (face-to-face plus online learning) is now part of the learning
landscape in Higher Education, not just for campus-based courses but also for
courses designed for students studying at a distance (Distance Education). This
paper focuses on exploring blended learning as an approach to the teaching and
learning of mathematics in Higher Education. Its provide insight and
understanding of current and future trends regarding how conventional
face-to-face instruction in mathematics is influenced by
web-based/computer-supported learning. Practical pedagogical issues related to
mathematics and blended learning in Higher Education are also discussed. The
researcher recommends that higher institutions could utilize blended learning
environment such as WebCT in the teaching and learning of mathematics in Higher
Education.
KEYWORDS
Blended
learning environment, Higher education, Mathematics, WebCT.
References:
1. Abramovitz,
B., Berezina, M., Bereman, A., & Shvartsman, L. (2012). A blended learning
approach in mathematics. In A. Ajuan, M. A. Huertas, S. Trenholm, and C.
Streegmann (Eds), Teaching mathematics
online: Emergent technology and methodologies (pp. 22-42). Retrieved on
04/07/13 from www.igi-global.com/chapter/blended-learning-approach-mathematics/57923
DOI: 10.40/8/978-60960-0
2. Albano,
G. (2012). Mathematics education: teaching and learning opportunities in
blended learning. Retrieved on 06/07/13 from www.igi-global.com/chapter/mathematics-education-teaching-learning-opportunities/57934
3. Albano,
G., & Maresca, G. (2010). A blended learning course in mathematics
education: a case study. Proceedings of the 7th PAN-Hellemi
Conference with International Participant (ICT Education). 1(1), (pp. 245-252).
4. Azizan,
F. Z. (2010). Blended learning in higher education institution in Malaysia.
Proceedings of Regional Conference on Knowledge Integration in ICT.
5. Boyle,
T., Bradley, C., Chalk, P., Jones, R., & Picard, P. (2003). Using blended
learning to improve student success rates in learning to program. Journal of Educational Media, 28(2-3),
(pp. 102-178). DOI: 10.1080/135816503200015316
6. Chin,
P. (2003). Virtual learning environment: learning and teaching support network.
LTSN Physical Sciences Centre, Available on www.physsci.Itsn.ac.uk
7. Downes,
S. (2010). Learning networks and connective knowledge. In H. H. Yang & S.
C. Yuen, Collective intelligence and e-learning 2.0: implication of web-based
communities and networking, (pp.1-26). Retrieved on 03/07/2013 from www.igi-global.com/chapter/learning-networks-connective-knowledge/37067
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-160566-729-4
8. Dziuban,
C., Hartman, J., Juge, F., Moskal, P.& Sorg, S.(2006). Blended learning
enters the mainstream. In C. J. Bonk & C. R. Graham (Eds), Handbook of
blended learning: global perspectives, local designs, (pp. 195-208). San
Francisco, CA: Pfeitter.
9. Garrison,
D. R., & Vaughan, N. D. (2004). Blended learning in higher education:
framework, principles, and guidelines. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
10. Groen,
L., & Carmody, G (2005). Blended learning in a first year mathematics
subject. Proceedings of Uniserve Science Blended Learning Symposium,
(pp.50-55). Retrieved on 24/09/14 from www.uniserve.edu.au/pubs/procs/wshop10/2005Groen.pdf
11. Holland,
F. (2012). Assessing the cost-effectiveness of online and blended learning.
Presented at PACE Seminar, Centre for Technology and School Change, Teacher
College, Columbia University.
12. Iozzi,
F., & Osimio, G. (2012). The virtual learning classroom in blended learning
mathematics undergraduate course. Presented at ICME 10. Available online at http://www.icme-organiser.dk/tsg15/Iozzi&osimio.pdf
13. Johnson,
J. (2002). Reflections on teaching a large enrollment course using a hybrid
format. Retrieved on 12/7/14 from http://www.uwa.edu/ttt/articles/jjohnson.htm
14. Komlenov,
Z., Budimac, Z., Putnik, Z., & Ivanovic, M. (2013). Wiki as a tool of
choice for students’ team assignments. International
Journal of Information System and Social Change, 4(3), (pp.1-16). Retrieved
on 20/06/2013 from www.igi-global.com/article/wiki-as-a-tool-of-choice-for-students-team-assignment/84798
DOI: 10.4018/jissc.20/3070101
15. Lizzio,
A., Wilson, K., & Simons, R (2002). University students’ perceptions of to
the learning environment and academic outcomes: Implication for theory and
practice. Studies in Higher Education,
27(1), (pp. 27-52). DOI: 10.1080/03075070120099359
16. Oliver,
M., & Trigwell, K (2005). Can blended learning be redeemed? E-learning.
DOI: 10.2304/elea.2005.2.1.17
17. Owston,
R., Wideman, H., Murphy, J., & Lupshenyuk, D. (2008). Blended teacher
professional development: a synthesis of three program evaluations. DOI:
10.1016/j.ihedu.2008.07.003
18. Siemens,
G. (2013). Connectivism: A learning theory for digital age. International
Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning. Retrieved on
12/04/2013 from www.connectivism.ca
19. Singh,
H. (2003). Building effective blended learning program. Educational Technology, 43(6), (pp.51-54)
20. Tella,
A. (2014).Globalization, blended learning, and mathematics education:
Implication of pedagogy in tertiary institution. Retrieved from www.igi-glabal.com/chapter/globalization-blended-learning-and-mathematics-education/83453
21. Tam, M. (2000). Constructivism,
instructional design and technology: implication for transforming distance
learning. Educational Technology & Society, 3(2), (pp. 50-60) Retrieved from
http://www.ifests.info/journal/3_2/tam.html
22. Torrieco, A. & Scancarello, I
(2009). A model for asynchronous discussion in a mathematics content course.
Retrieved from www.igi-global.com/chapter/model-asynchronous-discussion-mathematics-content/5793
23. Twigg, C. A (2003). Improving
learning and reducing cost: Lesson learned from round 1 of the grant program in
course redesign. Troy, NY: Centre of Academic Transformation. Retrieved from
www.then.cat.org/PCR/R1lesson.html
24. UNESCO (2002). Open and distance
learning: trends, policy, and strategy consideration. Paris: UNESCO.
25. Vaughan,
N. D. (2007). Perspectives on blended learning in higher education. International Journal of Blended Learning, 6(1),
(pp. 81-94).